Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checksum support #134

Closed
matttbe opened this issue Jan 13, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Checksum support #134

matttbe opened this issue Jan 13, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@matttbe
Copy link
Member

matttbe commented Jan 13, 2021

As defined in RFC8684, it needs to be negotiated:

(...)

The second octet is reserved for flags, allocated as follows:
A: The leftmost bit, labeled "A", SHOULD be set to 1 to indicate "Checksum required", unless the system administrator has decided that checksums are not required (for example, if the environment is controlled and no middleboxes exist that might adjust the payload).

(...)

Both the crypto and checksum bits negotiate capabilities in similar ways. For the "Checksum required" bit (labeled "A"), if either host requires the use of checksums, checksums MUST be used. In other words, the only way for checksums not to be used is if both hosts in their SYNs set A=0. This decision is confirmed by the setting of the "A" bit in the third packet (the ACK) of the handshake. For example, if the initiator sets A=0 in the SYN but the responder sets A=1 in the SYN/ACK, checksums MUST be used in both directions, and the initiator will set A=1 in the ACK. The decision regarding whether to use checksums will be stored by an implementation in a per-connection binary state variable. If A=1 is received by a host that does not want to use checksums, it MUST fall back to regular TCP by ignoring the MP_CAPABLE option as if it was invalid.

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8684.html#sec_init

But also when transferring data:

(...)

The flags, when set, define the contents of this option, as follows:

(...)

M = Data Sequence Number (DSN), Subflow Sequence Number (SSN), Data-Level Length, and Checksum (if negotiated) present

(...)

Note that the checksum is only present in this option if the use of MPTCP checksumming has been negotiated at the MP_CAPABLE handshake (see Section 3.1). The presence of the checksum can be inferred from the length of the option. If a checksum is present but its use had not been negotiated in the MP_CAPABLE handshake, the receiver MUST close the subflow with a RST, as it is not behaving as negotiated. If a checksum is not present when its use has been negotiated, the receiver MUST close the subflow with a RST, as it is considered broken. In both cases, this RST SHOULD be accompanied by an MP_TCPRST option (Section 3.6) with the reason code for an "MPTCP-specific error"

(...)

The Data Sequence Mapping also contains a checksum of the data that this mapping covers, if the use of checksums has been negotiated at the MP_CAPABLE exchange. Checksums are used to detect if the payload has been adjusted in any way by a non-MPTCP-aware middlebox. If this checksum fails, it will trigger a failure of the subflow, or a fallback to regular TCP, as documented in Section 3.7, since MPTCP can no longer reliably know the subflow sequence space at the receiver to build Data Sequence Mappings. Without checksumming enabled, corrupt data may be delivered to the application if a middlebox alters segment boundaries, alters content, or does not deliver all segments covered by a Data Sequence Mapping. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that checksumming be used, unless it is known that the network path contains no such devices.The checksum algorithm used is the standard TCP checksum [RFC0793], operating over the data covered by this mapping, along with a pseudo‑header as shown in Figure 10.

                       1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +--------------------------------------------------------------+
  |                                                              |
  |                Data Sequence Number (8 octets)               |
  |                                                              |
  +--------------------------------------------------------------+
  |              Subflow Sequence Number (4 octets)              |
  +-------------------------------+------------------------------+
  |  Data-Level Length (2 octets) |        Zeros (2 octets)      |
  +-------------------------------+------------------------------+

Figure 10: Pseudo-Header for DSS Checksum

Note that the data sequence number used in the pseudo-header is always the 64-bit value, irrespective of what length is used in the DSS option itself. The standard TCP checksum algorithm has been chosen, since it will be calculated anyway for the TCP subflow, and if calculated first over the data before adding the pseudo-headers, it only needs to be calculated once. Furthermore, since the TCP checksum is additive, the checksum for a DSN_MAP can be constructed by simply adding together the checksums for the data of each constituent TCP segment and adding the checksum for the DSS pseudo‑header.

Note that checksumming relies on the TCP subflow containing contiguous data; therefore, a TCP subflow MUST NOT use the Urgent Pointer to interrupt an existing mapping. Further note, however, that if Urgent data is received on a subflow, it SHOULD be mapped to the data sequence space and delivered to the application, analogous to Urgent data in regular TCP.

(...)

An "infinite" mapping can be used to fall back to regular TCP by mapping the subflow-level data to the connection-level data for the remainder of the connection (see Section 3.7). This is achieved by setting the Data-Level Length field of the DSS option to the reserved value of 0. The checksum, in such a case, will also be set to 0.

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8684.html#sec_generalop

And every other MPTCP packets headers.

Please also see the link with MP_FAIL #52 in the Fallback section: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8684.html#sec_fallback

@geliangtang
Copy link
Member

Hi Matt, I'll work on this issue.

jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 29, 2021
Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable
bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can
confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds
to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be
wrong.

After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth
documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation
interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as
barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and
will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in
the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original
field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *),
*(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using
barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to
calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of
switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load.

Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code
before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests.

BEFORE
=====
 #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32

     157:       18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll
     159:       7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1
     160:       b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4
; BYTE_SIZE relocation here                 ^^^
     161:       66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63>
     162:       16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65>
     163:       16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66>
     164:       05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>:
     165:       18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll
     167:       69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8)
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     168:       05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>:
     169:       16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67>
     170:       16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68>
     171:       05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>:
     172:       18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll
     174:       79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8)
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     175:       05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>:
     176:       18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll
     178:       71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8)
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     179:       05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69>

00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>:
     180:       18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll
     182:       61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8)
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>:
     183:       67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32
     184:       b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0
     185:       16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71>
     186:       c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32
     187:       05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72>

00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>:
     188:       77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32

AFTER
=====

 #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32

     129:       18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll
     131:       7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1
     132:       b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here                     ^^^
; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions
     133:       0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1
     134:       b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4
; BYTE_SIZE relocation here                 ^^^
     135:       66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63>
     136:       16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65>
     137:       16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66>
     138:       05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>:
     139:       69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0)
; NO CO-RE relocation here                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     140:       05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>:
     141:       16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67>
     142:       16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68>
     143:       05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>:
     144:       79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0)
; NO CO-RE relocation here                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     145:       05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>:
     146:       71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0)
; NO CO-RE relocation here                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     147:       05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69>

00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>:
     148:       61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0)
; NO CO-RE relocation here                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>:
     149:       67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32
     150:       b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0
     151:       16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71>
     152:       c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32
     153:       05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72>

00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>:
     154:       77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323

Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
@matttbe
Copy link
Member Author

matttbe commented May 6, 2021

Can be closed thanks to Geliang and Paolo's commits and reviews from Mat!

  • 9e37234: mptcp: add csum_enabled in mptcp_sock
  • 8e5a007: mptcp: generate the data checksum
  • 65d5dab: mptcp: add csum_reqd in mptcp_out_options
  • fa7ac4a: mptcp: send out checksum for MP_CAPABLE with data
  • 020aa27: mptcp: send out checksum for DSS
  • f343075: mptcp: add sk parameter for mptcp_parse_option
  • 36175fd: mptcp: add csum_reqd in mptcp_options_received
  • f9b610c: mptcp: receive checksum for MP_CAPABLE with data
  • dcf392e: mptcp: receive checksum for DSS
  • ff6ab77: mptcp: validate the data checksum
  • c30f4b4: mptcp: cleanup error path in subflow_check_data_avail()
  • 7929c26: mptcp: tune re-injections for csum enabled mode
  • b5cfe0d: mptcp: add the mib for data checksum
  • caf02cd: mptcp: add a new sysctl checksum_enabled
  • c8a3478: selftests: mptcp: enable checksum in mptcp_connect.sh
  • ed46f07: selftests: mptcp: enable checksum in mptcp_join.sh
  • Results: 0987319..e2c6aca


  • c5be02c: "squashed" patch 1/5 in "mptcp: add csum_reqd in mptcp_out_options"
  • 29f9232: "squashed" patch 2/5 in "mptcp: add the mib for data checksum"
  • ad81f7f: "squashed" patch 3/5 in "mptcp: add a new sysctl checksum_enabled"
  • e2cc6a7: mptcp: dump csum fields in mptcp_dump_mpext
  • d92aa7c: "squashed" patch 5/5 in "selftests: mptcp: enable checksum in mptcp_join.sh"
  • Results: dd923e7..9e9ac16

@matttbe matttbe closed this as completed May 6, 2021
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2021
Patch series "kasan, slub: reset tag when printing address", v3.

With hardware tag-based kasan enabled, we reset the tag when we access
metadata to avoid from false alarm.

This patch (of 2):

Kmemleak needs to scan kernel memory to check memory leak.  With hardware
tag-based kasan enabled, when it scans on the invalid slab and
dereference, the issue will occur as below.

Hardware tag-based KASAN doesn't use compiler instrumentation, we can not
use kasan_disable_current() to ignore tag check.

Based on the below report, there are 11 0xf7 granules, which amounts to
176 bytes, and the object is allocated from the kmalloc-256 cache.  So
when kmemleak accesses the last 256-176 bytes, it causes faults, as those
are marked with KASAN_KMALLOC_REDZONE == KASAN_TAG_INVALID == 0xfe.

Thus, we reset tags before accessing metadata to avoid from false positives.

  BUG: KASAN: out-of-bounds in scan_block+0x58/0x170
  Read at addr f7ff0000c0074eb0 by task kmemleak/138
  Pointer tag: [f7], memory tag: [fe]

  CPU: 7 PID: 138 Comm: kmemleak Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-00001-g8cae8cd89f05-dirty #134
  Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
  Call trace:
   dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b0
   show_stack+0x1c/0x30
   dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
   print_address_description+0x7c/0x2b4
   kasan_report+0x138/0x38c
   __do_kernel_fault+0x190/0x1c4
   do_tag_check_fault+0x78/0x90
   do_mem_abort+0x44/0xb4
   el1_abort+0x40/0x60
   el1h_64_sync_handler+0xb4/0xd0
   el1h_64_sync+0x78/0x7c
   scan_block+0x58/0x170
   scan_gray_list+0xdc/0x1a0
   kmemleak_scan+0x2ac/0x560
   kmemleak_scan_thread+0xb0/0xe0
   kthread+0x154/0x160
   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

  Allocated by task 0:
   kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x60
   __kasan_kmalloc+0xec/0x104
   __kmalloc+0x224/0x3c4
   __register_sysctl_paths+0x200/0x290
   register_sysctl_table+0x2c/0x40
   sysctl_init+0x20/0x34
   proc_sys_init+0x3c/0x48
   proc_root_init+0x80/0x9c
   start_kernel+0x648/0x6a4
   __primary_switched+0xc0/0xc8

  Freed by task 0:
   kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x60
   kasan_set_track+0x2c/0x40
   kasan_set_free_info+0x44/0x54
   ____kasan_slab_free.constprop.0+0x150/0x1b0
   __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x20
   slab_free_freelist_hook+0xa4/0x1fc
   kfree+0x1e8/0x30c
   put_fs_context+0x124/0x220
   vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x60/0xd4
   kern_mount+0x24/0x4c
   bdev_cache_init+0x70/0x9c
   vfs_caches_init+0xdc/0xf4
   start_kernel+0x638/0x6a4
   __primary_switched+0xc0/0xc8

  The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff0000c0074e00
   which belongs to the cache kmalloc-256 of size 256
  The buggy address is located 176 bytes inside of
   256-byte region [ffff0000c0074e00, ffff0000c0074f00)
  The buggy address belongs to the page:
  page:(____ptrval____) refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x100074
  head:(____ptrval____) order:2 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0
  flags: 0xbfffc0000010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xffff|kasantag=0x0)
  raw: 0bfffc0000010200 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 f5ff0000c0002300
  raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000200020 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
  page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

  Memory state around the buggy address:
   ffff0000c0074c00: f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 fe fe fe fe fe fe fe
   ffff0000c0074d00: fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe
  >ffff0000c0074e00: f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 f7 fe fe fe fe fe
                                                      ^
   ffff0000c0074f00: fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe
   ffff0000c0075000: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  ==================================================================
  Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
  kmemleak: 181 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Cc: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicholas Tang <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Chinwen Chang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
jenkins-tessares pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2023
LE Create CIS command shall not be sent before all CIS Established
events from its previous invocation have been processed. Currently it is
sent via hci_sync but that only waits for the first event, but there can
be multiple.

Make it wait for all events, and simplify the CIS creation as follows:

Add new flag HCI_CONN_CREATE_CIS, which is set if Create CIS has been
sent for the connection but it is not yet completed.

Make BT_CONNECT state to mean the connection wants Create CIS.

On events after which new Create CIS may need to be sent, send it if
possible and some connections need it. These events are:
hci_connect_cis, iso_connect_cfm, hci_cs_le_create_cis,
hci_le_cis_estabilished_evt.

The Create CIS status/completion events shall queue new Create CIS only
if at least one of the connections transitions away from BT_CONNECT, so
that we don't loop if controller is sending bogus events.

This fixes sending multiple CIS Create for the same CIS in the
"ISO AC 6(i) - Success" BlueZ test case:

< HCI Command: LE Create Co.. (0x08|0x0064) plen 9  #129 [hci0]
        Number of CIS: 2
        CIS Handle: 257
        ACL Handle: 42
        CIS Handle: 258
        ACL Handle: 42
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4           #130 [hci0]
      LE Create Connected Isochronous Stream (0x08|0x0064) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: LE Meta Event (0x3e) plen 29           #131 [hci0]
      LE Connected Isochronous Stream Established (0x19)
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Connection Handle: 257
        ...
< HCI Command: LE Setup Is.. (0x08|0x006e) plen 13  #132 [hci0]
        ...
> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 6         #133 [hci0]
      LE Setup Isochronous Data Path (0x08|0x006e) ncmd 1
        ...
< HCI Command: LE Create Co.. (0x08|0x0064) plen 5  #134 [hci0]
        Number of CIS: 1
        CIS Handle: 258
        ACL Handle: 42
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4           #135 [hci0]
      LE Create Connected Isochronous Stream (0x08|0x0064) ncmd 1
        Status: ACL Connection Already Exists (0x0b)
> HCI Event: LE Meta Event (0x3e) plen 29           #136 [hci0]
      LE Connected Isochronous Stream Established (0x19)
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Connection Handle: 258
        ...

Fixes: c09b80b ("Bluetooth: hci_conn: Fix not waiting for HCI_EVT_LE_CIS_ESTABLISHED")
Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants