This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 18, 2024. It is now read-only.
Problem with MP-TCP on LEDE #193
Labels
Comments
|
Can you capture a packet-trace on the sender side and share it with us? Thanks! |
|
Attached is the traces on both interfaces wlan1 which corresponds to 2.4 GHz band whereas wlan2 corresponds to 60 GHz. I took the traces at the receiver side in my case it is the AP side. In addition, I truncated the payload to save space. |
|
Sorry, I just realized that you asked for the traces on the sender Side. I attach new traces for 10 seconds with snapshot length of 96 bytes. I attach also the output of iPerf session. |
|
Hello, seems like you also have an interface with a 172/8 network. Can you disable this interface for MPTCP (on both, client and server) with |
|
In the current version,I have the old iproute2 which does not support mptcp options. As an alternative solution, I scripted everything thing to work without the management interface 172.16.17.8 (I verified that in the traces) despite that I am still getting the same low throughput. I checked the CPU usage during the iperf session and I found that when I am not using mptcp it is 20% (over the 60 GHz interface). Whereas when I enable mptcp CPU usage increases to 47%. I attach the new traces. |
cpaasch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 28, 2018
Commit 9a3efb6 ("bpf: fix memory leak in lpm_trie map_free callback function") fixed a memory leak and removed unnecessary locks in map_free callback function. Unfortrunately, it introduced a lockdep warning. When lockdep checking is turned on, running tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map will have: [ 98.294321] ============================= [ 98.294807] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 98.295359] 4.16.0-rc2+ #193 Not tainted [ 98.295907] ----------------------------- [ 98.296486] /home/yhs/work/bpf/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:572 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 98.297657] [ 98.297657] other info that might help us debug this: [ 98.297657] [ 98.298663] [ 98.298663] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 98.299536] 2 locks held by kworker/2:1/54: [ 98.300152] #0: ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: [<00000000196bc1f0>] process_one_work+0x157/0x5c0 [ 98.301381] #1: ((work_completion)(&map->work)){+.+.}, at: [<00000000196bc1f0>] process_one_work+0x157/0x5c0 Since actual trie tree removal happens only after no other accesses to the tree are possible, replacing rcu_dereference_protected(*slot, lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock)) with rcu_dereference_protected(*slot, 1) fixed the issue. Fixes: 9a3efb6 ("bpf: fix memory leak in lpm_trie map_free callback function") Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
dreibh
pushed a commit
to dreibh/mptcp
that referenced
this issue
Sep 21, 2018
commit edf4e7b upstream. apparmor_secid_to_secctx() has a bad debug statement tripping on a condition handle by the code. When kconfig SECURITY_APPARMOR_DEBUG is enabled the debug WARN_ON will trip when **secdata is NULL resulting in the following trace. ------------[ cut here ]------------ AppArmor WARN apparmor_secid_to_secctx: ((!secdata)): WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 14826 at security/apparmor/secid.c:82 apparmor_secid_to_secctx+0x2b5/0x2f0 security/apparmor/secid.c:82 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 14826 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc1+ multipath-tcp#193 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x1c9/0x2b4 lib/dump_stack.c:113 panic+0x238/0x4e7 kernel/panic.c:184 __warn.cold.8+0x163/0x1ba kernel/panic.c:536 report_bug+0x252/0x2d0 lib/bug.c:186 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 [inline] do_error_trap+0x1fc/0x4d0 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:296 do_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:316 invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:993 RIP: 0010:apparmor_secid_to_secctx+0x2b5/0x2f0 security/apparmor/secid.c:82 Code: c7 c7 40 66 58 87 e8 6a 6d 0f fe 0f 0b e9 6c fe ff ff e8 3e aa 44 fe 48 c7 c6 80 67 58 87 48 c7 c7 a0 65 58 87 e8 4b 6d 0f fe <0f> 0b e9 3f fe ff ff 48 89 df e8 fc a7 83 fe e9 ed fe ff ff bb f4 RSP: 0018:ffff8801ba1bed10 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8801ba1beed0 RCX: ffffc9000227e000 RDX: 0000000000018482 RSI: ffffffff8163ac01 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8801ba1bed30 R08: ffff8801b80ec080 R09: ffffed003b603eca R10: ffffed003b603eca R11: ffff8801db01f657 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8801ba1beed0 security_secid_to_secctx+0x63/0xc0 security/security.c:1314 ctnetlink_secctx_size net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:621 [inline] ctnetlink_nlmsg_size net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:659 [inline] ctnetlink_conntrack_event+0x303/0x1470 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:706 nf_conntrack_eventmask_report+0x55f/0x930 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c:151 nf_conntrack_event_report include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.h:112 [inline] nf_ct_delete+0x33c/0x5d0 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:601 nf_ct_iterate_cleanup+0x48c/0x5e0 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1892 nf_ct_iterate_cleanup_net+0x23c/0x2d0 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1974 ctnetlink_flush_conntrack net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:1226 [inline] ctnetlink_del_conntrack+0x66c/0x850 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:1258 nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0xd88/0x1070 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:228 netlink_rcv_skb+0x172/0x440 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2454 nfnetlink_rcv+0x1c0/0x4d0 net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:560 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1317 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x5a0/0x760 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1343 netlink_sendmsg+0xa18/0xfc0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1908 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:621 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xd5/0x120 net/socket.c:631 ___sys_sendmsg+0x7fd/0x930 net/socket.c:2114 __sys_sendmsg+0x11d/0x290 net/socket.c:2152 __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2161 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2159 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0 net/socket.c:2159 do_syscall_64+0x1b9/0x820 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x457089 Code: fd b4 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 cb b4 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007f7bc6e03c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7bc6e046d4 RCX: 0000000000457089 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020d65000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00000000009300a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000ffffffff R13: 00000000004d4588 R14: 00000000004c8d5c R15: 0000000000000000 Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) Kernel Offset: disabled Rebooting in 86400 seconds.. CC: <[email protected]> multipath-tcp#4.18 Fixes: c092921 ("apparmor: add support for mapping secids and using secctxes") Reported-by: [email protected] Signed-off-by: John Johansen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi,
I have two TP-Link Routers running LEDE with MP-TCP v0.92 kernel version 4.4.70. One of the routers runs as an AP and the other runs as a station. I use the two wireless interfaces 60 GHz and 2.4 GHz to establish either a single TCP flow or two concurrent flows using MP-TCP. I generate the traffic using iPerf v2.0.9.
When I use the 60 GHz alone (802.11ad), I get around 1.85 GHz of throughput. Whereas, when I use the 2.4 GHz (802.11n) alone, I get almost 20 Mbps. The strange thing is when I combine two interfaces using MP-TCP (i.e. two flows at the same time), I get around 300 Mbps. So why am I getting this strange result? Should not MP-TCP achieves throughout of 1850 Mbps + 20 Mbps?
I tried to tune TCP parameters like maximum read/write buffer but with no success. Here is the network configuration.
60 GHz Interface:
Network: 11.0.0.0/24
Station IP Address: 11.0.0.01
AP IP Address: 11.0.0.07
2.4 GHz Interface:
Network: 10.0.0.0/24
Station IP Address: 10.0.0.01
AP IP Address: 10.0.0.07
MP-TCP Configuration:
Congestion Control: Cubic
MP-TCP Enabled: True
MP-TCP Checksum: False
MP-TCP Path Manager = Full Mesh
MP-TCP scheduler = default
MP-TCP syn retries = 3
MP-TCP version = 0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: