Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coqui tts: change to better maintained fork #2513

Closed
blob42 opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3625
Closed

coqui tts: change to better maintained fork #2513

blob42 opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3625
Labels
enhancement New feature or request roadmap

Comments

@blob42
Copy link
Contributor

blob42 commented Jun 7, 2024

The coqui tts currently used has been unmaintained since some time. It seems this repo is the new maintained fork that is taking over. It is this fork that powers the RealtimeTTS library library.

It would also be great to add support for the RealtimeTTS engine. I would be glad to make a PR for both.

@blob42 blob42 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 7, 2024
@dave-gray101
Copy link
Collaborator

I think this is a great idea!

FYI: the existing extra-coqui test can be a bit flaky, and tends to need repeats sometimes. It's potentially related to being old as you say... or there may be something iffy with the code itself to keep an eye out for.

@mudler
Copy link
Owner

mudler commented Jun 7, 2024

good point indeed! now that coqui is off the table pointing to a maintained version would be much wanted and better 👍

@AlexM4H
Copy link

AlexM4H commented Sep 20, 2024

BTW: The fork at https://github.com/idiap/coqui-ai-TTS is 198 commits ahead of coqui-ai/TTS

@mudler mudler added the roadmap label Sep 21, 2024
mudler added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2024
mudler added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request roadmap
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants