-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invalid certificates? - Unable to locally verify the issuer's authority. #33
Comments
A bit more info; it seems like the Chromium derivatives (Chromem, Brave, Edge, etc) and our Windows GitLab runner are happy with the certificate. Firefox, ubuntu based GitLab runners, wget on MacOS all complain that the certificates are invalid. My hunch at the moment is that the certificate chain created by the role is invalid. |
… certificate now. At this point I'm unsure if this is a permanent change but several tests for different domain names over a few days seems to suggest it is. Fixes issues noted in mprahl#33.
The above commit 'fixes' the issue in my testing (where all new certificates were issued from the R3 chain). Although if LetsEncrypt changing their certificate chain is a thing, then maybe there is someway for the role to detect the change and handle it appropriately? |
… certificate now. At this point I'm unsure if this is a permanent change but several tests for different domain names over a few days seems to suggest it is. Fixes issues noted in #33.
Thanks for the contribution @danwashusen. The fix is released in v4.7.0. |
Hi! We've been using the role since 4.3 with good success. This morning I upgraded to v4.6 and kicked off the renewal process, as I've done several times before... However this time it appears the certificate is invalid (Ubuntu 20.04):
While trying to figure out what's wrong I noticed that the certificate chain appears to have changed:
Oddly Chrome/Brave is happy to open the certificate...
At this point I'm not sure its this role that's the cause of the issues but I thought I'd raise a ticket as it seems likely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: