Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable flake8 check in tox/TravisCI #77

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 16, 2018

Conversation

leplatrem
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@leplatrem
Copy link
Contributor Author

Although the flake8 check is ran locally, it does not appear to be ran on TravisCI

@Natim Natim force-pushed the enable-flake8-check branch from 873d5a0 to a772bdb Compare December 20, 2017 12:27
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 20, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #77 into master will decrease coverage by 0.28%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #77      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.53%   94.24%   -0.29%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         841      834       -7     
==========================================
- Hits          795      786       -9     
- Misses         46       48       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
jose/backends/pycrypto_backend.py 97.11% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
jose/jwt.py 94.15% <0%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
jose/jws.py 94.11% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
jose/__init__.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
jose/utils.py 63.15% <100%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
jose/jwk.py 100% <100%> (+4.87%) ⬆️
jose/backends/__init__.py 55.55% <100%> (+5.55%) ⬆️
jose/backends/cryptography_backend.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
jose/backends/ecdsa_backend.py 98.66% <50%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4e5cdbb...e4ac977. Read the comment docs.

@Natim Natim force-pushed the enable-flake8-check branch from 6a27a00 to e4ac977 Compare December 20, 2017 13:35
@mpdavis
Copy link
Owner

mpdavis commented Jan 16, 2018

lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants