Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update comments for key argument #103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2018
Merged

update comments for key argument #103

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2018

Conversation

imsteev
Copy link
Contributor

@imsteev imsteev commented Jul 12, 2018

_get_keys(key) in jws.py allows for the key argument to already be in dictionary format. This PR updates comments to clarify for important functions.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #103 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #103   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.58%   93.58%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines         998      998           
=======================================
  Hits          934      934           
  Misses         64       64
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
jose/jwt.py 94.19% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
jose/jws.py 94.11% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6b3d557...0955621. Read the comment docs.

@mpdavis
Copy link
Owner

mpdavis commented Jul 17, 2018

lgtm

@mpdavis mpdavis merged commit 7ff8122 into mpdavis:master Jul 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants