-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more categories of unsupported features. #11863
Conversation
cb44764
to
79fca62
Compare
@@ -294,6 +294,18 @@ const UNSUPPORTED_FEATURES = { | |||
smask: "smask", | |||
shadingPattern: "shadingPattern", | |||
font: "font", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Assuming that the font
key is actually unused now, should it be removed?
The same question also applies for the unknown
key above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are exposed on the API, so I'll just mark them as @deprecated
for now,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are exposed on the API,
That's certainly true, but considering that nothing (in the PDF.js code) actually uses them now I just wondered what good they do for an API user at this point!?
Anyway, it doesn't matter much either way here and the patch looks good as-is :-)
79fca62
to
5bea7e4
Compare
@@ -294,6 +294,18 @@ const UNSUPPORTED_FEATURES = { | |||
smask: "smask", | |||
shadingPattern: "shadingPattern", | |||
font: "font", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are exposed on the API,
That's certainly true, but considering that nothing (in the PDF.js code) actually uses them now I just wondered what good they do for an API user at this point!?
Anyway, it doesn't matter much either way here and the patch looks good as-is :-)
/botio unittest |
From: Bot.io (Windows)ReceivedCommand cmd_unittest from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.215.176.217:8877/542f32ae5756071/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)ReceivedCommand cmd_unittest from @timvandermeij received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.67.70.0:8877/c295a37fe6b30c3/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)SuccessFull output at http://54.67.70.0:8877/c295a37fe6b30c3/output.txt Total script time: 3.59 mins
|
From: Bot.io (Windows)SuccessFull output at http://54.215.176.217:8877/542f32ae5756071/output.txt Total script time: 4.58 mins
|
5bea7e4
to
b1be33c
Compare
Thank you! |
Fixes #11815
For non-generic missing features that are errors I've prefixed them with "error."