Skip to content

Implement alt token fee#205

Merged
curryxbo merged 33 commits intomainfrom
feature/erc20-fee
Nov 14, 2025
Merged

Implement alt token fee#205
curryxbo merged 33 commits intomainfrom
feature/erc20-fee

Conversation

@curryxbo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@curryxbo curryxbo commented Oct 13, 2025

1. Purpose or design rationale of this PR

...

2. PR title

Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: yarn, eslint, typescript)
  • ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: vercel, github, cypress)
  • docs: Documentation-only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that doesn't fix a bug, or add a feature, or improves performance
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

3. Deployment tag versioning

Has the version in params/version.go been updated?

  • This PR doesn't involve a new deployment, git tag, docker image tag, and it doesn't affect traces
  • Yes

4. Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

  • This PR is not a breaking change
  • Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Pay gas with ERC20-like tokens via a new alternate-fee transaction type; wallets and RPCs accept fee token ID and fee limit.
    • Transaction receipts, traces and execution results include token-fee metadata (token ID, rate, scale, limit).
  • Improvements

    • Gas estimation, mempool validation and promotion consider ERC20 balances and ETH↔token conversions.
    • Light clients, tracers and tooling expose ERC20-fee fields for better observability and validation.

Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants