Skip to content

morden35/ridesharing_ml

Repository files navigation

Ridesharing in Chicago, IL:

Exploring community- and trip-level factors influencing willingness to pool

Valeria Balza
University of Chicago
[email protected]

Michelle Orden
University of Chicago
[email protected]

Abstract

The emergence of ridesourcing providers such as Uber and Lyft have prompted numerous questions around urban mobility, the gig economy, and environmental sustainability—among other topics. While recent research focuses on the benefits and limitations of ridesharing, we explore the factors affecting customers’ willingness to share rides with other customers (i.e., ridesplitting). In particular, we integrate ridesourcing trip data featuring cost, time and spatial variables with socioeconomic and demographic data for Chicago, IL and train Lasso Regression and Random Forest models to predict customers’ willingness to share rides with other customers. After accounting for multicollinearity in our data, we find that trip-level factors—namely cost and distance—and community area-level factors—namely percentage of white population and median income—are among the top features affecting customers’ willingness to split rides. The identified patterns can help the city’s policymakers identify community areas with the greatest potential to promote ridesplitting as the debate on ridesourcing behavior evolves.

Introduction

The emergence of ridesourcing providers such as Uber and Lyft have prompted numerous questions around urban mobility, the gig economy, and environmental sustainability—among other topics. While some argue such services provide first- and last-mile solutions to transit, others suggest the access to and use of ridesourcing services have been geographically and socially uneven (Jin et al., 2019, Rayle et al., 2016; Shaheen and Cohen, 2018; Su and Wang, 2019; Tarabay and Abou-Zeid 2019; Yan et al., 2019). Several studies, for instance, reveal demand for ridesourcing is concentrated in medium and large urban areas with younger, more educated, and wealthier populations—highlighting technological and financial barriers among low-income groups (Goodspeed et al., 2019; Grahn et al., 2019; King, Conway, and Salon, 2020; Spurlock et al., 2019; Young and Farber, 2019).

Recent research also points to the environmental effects of ridesourcing, noting ridesplitting—in which customers share rides with other customers heading in the same direction—can mitigate traffic congestion, reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, as well as curb parking demand (Wang and Yang, 2019; Cramer and Krueger, 2016; Tirachini and Gomez-Lobo, 2019; Xue et al. 2018). Still, a parallel body of research demonstrates ridesourcing providers have introduced more idle vehicles on the road, increased traffic congestion, and contributed to air and noise pollution (Rayle et al., 2016; Wei at al., 2017; Wenzel et al. 2019). Despite increasing evidence on the positive and negative effects of ridesourcing, limited research exists characterizing the factors affecting customers’ willingness to share/pool rides with other customers. This characterization is important to better understand how the benefits and costs of ridesourcing are spatially distributed across cities. We leverage data containing time, cost, and location features for ridesourcing trips for the city of Chicago and integrate it with community area-level socioeconomic and demographic variables. We then train two classification algorithms—Lasso Regression and Random Forest models—to predict a customer’s willingness to share their ride with another customer.

Specifically, given a new rider’s pickup and drop-off community area and the demographic and socioeconomic information associated with said community areas, what is the predicted outcome for whether the rider authorizes a shared ride? Further, what trip- and community-level features associated with a given ride contribute to whether or not a rider agrees to a pooled trip? Exploring such questions will allow us to see if and how ridesplitting behavior varies with socioeconomic and demographic variables related to a given community area—providing additional context to the debate on ridesourcing.

See https://github.com/morden35/ridesharing_ml/blob/master/balza_orden.pdf for the full report.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published