Skip to content

chore(openspec): tick isolated-branch-stack 4.3 with fresh gate evidence - #496

Closed
monkey1sai wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
chore/isolated-branch-stack-tick-43
Closed

monkey1sai wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
chore/isolated-branch-stack-tick-43

Conversation

@monkey1sai

@monkey1sai monkey1sai commented Aug 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • OpenSpec change isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e task 4.3 收官:以 2026-08-11 HEAD 7929d74(== origin/main)的實跑證據勾選「對 scripts/tests/test-agent-governance-check.ps1 既有 dead-link/行數 gate 重跑」。
  • 證據:pwsh -NoProfile -File scripts/tests/test-agent-governance-check.ps1 → 45 pass/0 fail(前置 test-agent-skills-sync 11 pass/0 fail),最終輸出 [test-agent-governance-check] all assertions passed。
  • 此前該指令在本機的 content-drift 紅燈已診斷為 stale checkout 的 EOL 殘留(index 兩側 blob 一致、main CI 同 HEAD 綠),與 1.1–1.3 文件改動無關;細節寫入 tasks.md 4.3 證據行。
  • 誠實邊界:5.2/5.3 維持未勾(被 a4-console-convergence 的 IFC-ready job 缺口擋住,run p5-20260730-163713),本 change 不 archive。

AI Coding Governance

Machine values: Change lane = F / B / G / S; Behavior contract changed = yes / no; Requirement source = issue / docs/plans / superpowers spec / existing contract / not applicable.

Item Result
Change lane F
Behavior contract changed no
Linked issue none(openspec checkbox closeout;change 契約 PR #428)
Requirement source existing contract(openspec/changes/isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e/tasks.md task 4.3)
CODEOWNERS / owner review requested
GitNexus evidence not needed
Browser E2E evidence not user-facing
Agent workflow changed? no
Required checks expected CI / Agent Governance / PR Metadata Contract

Frontend Verification

User-facing changes must pass two independent producers: real frontend/runtime operability evidence and the pinned docs/plans/design-system-reference.manifest.json fidelity gate. Scope is derived from changed paths plus the base/head manifest union; the PR body cannot select an easier screen. mixed and partial_reference_missing permit honest partial work but require Full completion claimed = no. Semantic evidence is produced only by the design-semantic-visual CI Playwright job, never supplied as PR input; PR Metadata Contract validates the live PR metadata, while normal protected CI checks determine mergeability.

Item Result
Frontend route not applicable
Main button(s) tested not applicable
Fixture used not applicable
Backend API called not applicable
Runtime action not applicable
Visible success state not applicable
E2E command not applicable
Screenshot / trace not applicable
Design gate status not applicable
Design screen(s) not applicable
Reference-missing route(s) / surface(s) not applicable
Full completion claimed no
Design reference manifest docs/plans/design-system-reference.manifest.json
Visual fidelity result not applicable
Visual comparison not applicable
Visual artifacts not applicable
Manual test steps not applicable
Known gaps not applicable

Deploy Path Verification

Required for runtime / Docker / Kit / viewer / ports / env / conversion-service changes.

Item Result
Affects runtime / docker / Kit / viewer / ports / env? no
Canonical deploy path updated? not needed
New root script added? no
Deploy dry-run command not applicable
Full deploy tested not available
Verify command not applicable
Frontend URL verified not applicable
Evidence path openspec/changes/isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e/tasks.md(4.3 證據行)

Self-Referential Bootstrap

Required when the PR changes the verification mechanism itself (deploy path / evidence harness / gate script). Rule: docs/agents/self-referential-bootstrap.md. Open ledger debt in scripts/self-referential-bootstrap-ledger.json blocks further mechanism PRs until fixpoint closure.

Item Result
Self-referential bootstrap no
Bootstrap ledger entry not applicable
Bootstrap reason not applicable

Validation

  • pwsh -NoProfile -File scripts/tests/test-agent-governance-check.ps1 → 45 pass/0 fail、all assertions passed(HEAD 7929d74)。
  • npx openspec validate isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e --strict → Change 'isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e' is valid。
  • git diff --cached --check → clean。

Known Risks

  • 無 runtime 影響(單一 tasks.md checkbox+證據行)。殘留缺口 5.2/5.3 已誠實標示為 blocked,未在本 PR 宣稱。

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated project progress tracking to reflect completion of a validation milestone.
    • Recorded successful checks with 45 validations passing and no failures.
    • Confirmed supporting synchronization checks completed successfully with 11 passes and no failures.
    • Clarified that a previously observed local checkout issue did not reflect changes to the repository.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings August 11, 2026 11:19
@monkey1sai
monkey1sai enabled auto-merge (squash) August 11, 2026 11:20
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2f05fdd0-472a-4a85-9f0a-e1a68c2f2d9a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

本次變更更新 tasks.md,將 Machine gate 4.3 標記為完成,並記錄 governance check 與 skills sync 的通過結果,以及 stale checkout EOL 導致的本機誤報。

Changes

Machine gate completion

Layer / File(s) Summary
Record governance check results
openspec/changes/isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e/tasks.md
將 agent governance check 標記為完成,並記錄 45 pass/0 fail、skills sync 11 pass/0 fail,以及 stale checkout EOL 診斷。

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: monkey1sai-blip

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the OpenSpec task update and the addition of fresh gate evidence.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/isolated-branch-stack-tick-43

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 444eb4c650

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread openspec/changes/isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e/tasks.md

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR closes out task 4.3 of the OpenSpec change isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e by flipping its checkbox from [ ] to [x] in tasks.md and recording fresh gate-rerun evidence (a test-agent-governance-check.ps1 run at HEAD 7929d74). It is a documentation/governance-bookkeeping change only, with no runtime impact; tasks 5.2/5.3 remain honestly unchecked because they are blocked by an upstream A4 IFC-ready job gap.

Changes:

  • Marks task 4.3 as complete and appends a dated evidence line describing a 45-pass/0-fail governance-check run and the diagnosis of a prior local content-drift red as a stale-checkout EOL artifact.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread openspec/changes/isolated-branch-stack-browser-e2e/tasks.md

@codex-tri-adversarial-bot codex-tri-adversarial-bot Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Codex Tri-Adversarial Bot

Automated tri-adversarial ship-gate (L0 terra triage / L1 tier-routed lens fanout / L2 refute-by-default / L3 sol apex — Codex models).
Mapped event: COMMENT


Codex Tri-Adversarial ship-gate — PR #496

  • Repo head: chore/isolated-branch-stack-tick-43 @ 0f778a2
  • Base: main @ 7929d74
  • Files changed: 2
  • Engine: four-model tri-adversarial gate on Codex — L0 triage gpt-5.6-terra/low; L1 lens finders routed gpt-5.6-terra/low → gpt-5.6-luna/medium → gpt-5.5/xhigh (security floor gpt-5.5); L2 refute-by-default gpt-5.5/xhigh, top-tier findings refuted by gpt-5.6-sol/xhigh (every refutation cross-model); L3 apex gpt-5.6-sol/max. 誠實聲明:層級與 Claude 三層 gate 同構(terra≈haiku、luna≈sonnet、gpt-5.5≈opus、sol≈fable),但模型池是 Codex 的,非 Anthropic 的。

Verdict

SHIP

  • 阻擋門檻 severity: critical, high
  • mapped GitHub event: COMMENT
  • ℹ️ 判定為 SHIP,但刻意不送 APPROVE:GitHub App 的 approving review 不計入 required_approving_review_count(2026-07-31 實測)。本報告是證據,approving 那一票請由真人帳號投。

Difficulty & routing

  • overall: high (source: terra-triage)
  • lens tiers: correctness→gpt-5.5, security→gpt-5.5, simplification→gpt-5.6-luna, test-gap→gpt-5.5

Layer stats

  • L1: raw=1 deduped=1 finder_failures=0
  • L2: confirmed=0 refuted=1 unverified=0
  • L3 final: 0

Killed (did not survive L2/L3)

  • S1 [low] 同一份 gate 證據重複寫入 task 與 ledger,增加維護負擔 — 此 finding 把正常的雙層記錄誤判成不必要重複。tasks.md 是勾選 4.3 的細節證據,包含為何可從未完成改成完成,以及先前 local red 為何不是 repo drift;lifecycle-ledger.json 則是 active change 的短狀態摘要、task count、last_verified 與 subject_commit。兩者重疊的只有日期、gate 名稱與 pass/fail/HEAD 這種必要索引資訊,並非同一份完整診斷被複製兩次。diff 中 ledger 還受 500-char budget 約束,並未承載 EOL 診斷全文。沒有看到

Summary

No actionable survivor findings remain; the final finding set is empty. The sole L1 simplification concern remains excluded because the task contains detailed evidence while the ledger carries a bounded status summary, with no demonstrated inconsistency or maintenance defect.

Agent calls

  • 7/7 ok, engine wall-clock 224.2s

VERDICT

SHIP

VERDICT: SHIP

monkey1sai and others added 2 commits August 12, 2026 04:05
test-agent-governance-check.ps1 rerun at HEAD 7929d74 (== origin/main): 45
pass / 0 fail including the AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md line-budget and dead-link
assertions task 4.3 guards; preceding test-agent-skills-sync 11 pass. The
earlier local red was a stale-checkout EOL artifact (worktree files checked
out before the eol=lf attributes landed; index blobs identical, main CI
green at the same HEAD), resolved by re-smudging the worktree — not a repo
content drift and unrelated to the 1.1-1.3 doc edits.

Refs #428 (change contract). Tasks 5.2/5.3 remain honestly unchecked,
blocked on the a4-console-convergence IFC-ready job gap.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
task_ledger 30->31, subject_commit rebound to the tasks.md tick commit
(444eb4c), current_slice rewritten within the 500-char budget with the
2026-08-11 gate rerun evidence. Local gates: test-openspec-machine-truth
24 pass / 0 fail, test-ai-coding-metrics 13 pass / 0 fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@monkey1sai
monkey1sai force-pushed the chore/isolated-branch-stack-tick-43 branch from 0f778a2 to 870ffcc Compare August 11, 2026 20:05

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 870ffcc2fa

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread openspec/lifecycle-ledger.json Outdated
"scripts/tests/test-isolated-branch-stack.ps1"
],
"subject_commit": "5e8d677ef6c8a5cfe836d17cf019e5530c36e86e",
"subject_commit": "444eb4c650e34d747445697885396ab4870a0c74",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Rebind the ledger row to a reachable subject

In a clean checkout of ac6003d, this SHA is neither available locally nor an ancestor of HEAD, so the “Run OpenSpec machine-truth tests” step in .github/workflows/agent-governance.yml fails at current ledger keeps reconciled source snapshots clean with subject_unavailable. Fresh evidence beyond the earlier green-run reply is that the exact reviewed commit has parent c88dca6 and no longer contains the pre-squash 444eb4c object; rebind this row to a source snapshot reachable from the reviewed history.

AGENTS.md reference: openspec/AGENTS.md:L32-L33

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8a3b44f5f8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

"docs/plans/NOW.md",
"scripts/tests/test-isolated-branch-stack.ps1"
],
"subject_commit": "5db337e88a083ee8d04495187b38dd5f8f06f7ba",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Rebind the lifecycle row to an ancestral snapshot

Fresh evidence for the reviewed commit is that 5db337e88a083ee8d04495187b38dd5f8f06f7ba exists but is a sibling of 671fbdb—both have parent c88dca6—rather than an ancestor. In a detached checkout of exactly 671fbdb, the required OpenSpec machine-truth suite fails at current ledger keeps reconciled source snapshots clean with subject_not_ancestor, so the agent-governance workflow cannot pass until this row is rebound in a follow-up commit to a snapshot reachable from the reviewed HEAD.

AGENTS.md reference: openspec/AGENTS.md:L32-L33

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread openspec/lifecycle-ledger.json Outdated
}
]
}
{

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve the ledger's existing LF line endings

This commit converts all 2,438 terminated lines in the shared lifecycle ledger from LF to CRLF even though, after normalizing line endings, only six lines contain semantic edits. As a result Git presents the entire 2,439-line file as replaced, obscuring the actual row update and making concurrent ledger changes substantially more likely to conflict; retain the existing LF endings and commit only the intended row changes.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L31-L32

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@monkey1sai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Superseded by #500.

Reason: this PR's intended net diff remained 2 files / +5 / -5, but two temporary Contents API commits introduced cancelling whole-file CRLF history and inflated the tri-adversarial --patch payload above the standard review cap. #500 rebuilds the same task/ledger change from fresh origin/main with canonical LF blobs and a clean provenance chain. Its exact-head machine-truth, OpenSpec, agent-governance, and local PR preflight are green.

This PR is closed unmerged; #500 is the delivery authority.

@monkey1sai monkey1sai closed this Aug 11, 2026
@monkey1sai
monkey1sai deleted the chore/isolated-branch-stack-tick-43 branch August 11, 2026 22:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants