Repository navigation
docs(agents): 治理審計 P1b — repo-boundary 歷史敘事集中遷移（817→667） - #277
Conversation
…817→667） sonnet planner+雙 judge（抓 6 個 fence 邊界 blocker）→修正→複審 approve； executor 行號驅動由檔尾往檔頭執行 11 moves；守恆/渲染/引用三 verifier 全 pass。 § 章節編號全數凍結（§12 刪除為核准例外）；§1.A 效力宣告與 §10/§11 閉環不動。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CAswRmGWDHkrTUSmsq1vZy
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 39 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR is part of the P1b governance-documentation audit. It consolidates historical narrative about the retired _worker / _bim-control services—previously scattered throughout repo-boundary-detail.md—into the dedicated history-and-archive.md, trimming the boundary doc from 817 to 667 lines and growing the history doc from 145 to 325 lines. This is a pure documentation change with no code symbols affected, keeping the current-runtime boundary doc focused while preserving the historical record verbatim for archival lookups.
Changes:
- Migrated retired data-flow diagrams (§5.1/§5.4/§5.5), the ownership splits (§7.1/§7.4), the
_workerdon't-do list (§8.5), the historical communication-table rows (§6), and the OpenSpec landing record (§1.A) into new history sections §3.4–§3.7, each leaving a source pointer. - Corrected a stale ownership entry (
mapping metadata → _bim-control) to the current destination (external company-cloud via coordinator callback outbox), and de-duplicated §8.4 and the old §12 wiki-guidance section with pointers to their authoritative replacements. - Preserved all section numbering/anchors relied on by sub-repo CLAUDE.md mirrors and left a head-of-file pointer where §12 was removed.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/agents/repo-boundary-detail.md | Replaces retired-service narrative blocks with concise migration pointers, corrects a stale ownership line, and removes the superseded §12; current-service sections and §6 current rows remain intact. |
| docs/agents/history-and-archive.md | Adds §3.4–§3.7 containing the verbatim migrated historical diagrams, tables, ownership splits, and OpenSpec execution record, each annotated with a migration provenance note. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
PR Review Agent Summary
Blockers
Warnings
Validation Commands
Checks
Human Review Notes
|
_bim-control/_worker 被寫成現行對象的殘句改指現行架構 （coordinator internal request / callback、viewer 一律走 coordinator、 外部公司雲端 control-plane）；合法歷史語境 4 處保留。 來源：#277 三 lens 驗證 nit + 全檔補掃。 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CAswRmGWDHkrTUSmsq1vZy Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
摘要
治理審計 P1b（ultracode）：
repo-boundary-detail.md散落的已退役服務歷史敘事集中遷移至history-and-archive.md（817→667 行；歷史檔 145→325 行）。formal spec：docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-02-agent-governance-doc-alignment.md（P1 深水區項）。純文件變更，零 code symbol。方法（多 agent 對抗流程）
detect_changes（risk low、affected_processes=0）。變更內容
_worker補充規則→§3.6；§7.4 review 資料 ownership→§3.4。mapping metadata → _bim-control改為現行去向（外部公司雲端，經 coordinator callback outbox）。已知殘留（驗證 nit，計畫 keeps 明列不動）：§3.5/§3.6/§8.2/§8.3 尚有零星把已刪服務寫成現行對象的既有句子，屬後續「零星舊服務名 rewrite」輪次，不在本 PR 範圍。
AI Coding Governance
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01CAswRmGWDHkrTUSmsq1vZy