Repository navigation
docs(plans): md↔html 一致性交叉驗證審批報告（2026-06-16） - #216
Conversation
多 agent 交叉驗證 + 主控 grep 抽查的審批報告，記錄 .md 規格與 .html 原型的 真實使用情境一致性，列出 8 個落差與證據（原型無真 hash 路由、geo-viewer 未被 v2/v3 點名、原型殘留 BCF3.0 與舊編號、假按鈕、路由清單不齊等）。 純文件新增，不改任何需求/規格/程式碼。
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 55 minutes and 41 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a single new documentation file — a cross-validation audit report (審批報告-md與html一致性交叉驗證-2026-06-16.md) under docs/plans/. The report documents a multi-agent review of consistency between three .md specification files and two .html prototype files already in the repo. It identifies 10 discrepancies (8 actionable, 2 minor) with evidence and recommendations, and is intended as a companion artifact to PR #214's implementation discipline guidelines.
Changes:
- Adds a 100-line audit report documenting 10 discrepancies found between markdown specs and HTML prototypes, with verified evidence (grep-confirmed line numbers) and a prioritized action list.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)
docs/plans/審批報告-md與html一致性交叉驗證-2026-06-16.md:100
- This closing paragraph contains ephemeral, conversational language (e.g., "由你決定", "要的話跟我說要先做哪幾項") and a point-in-time state claim ("repo 目前在 main、有大量未提交修改") that will become stale and confusing for future readers once the report is committed. A committed audit report should be self-contained and not read like a chat message. Consider removing or rewriting this note to be a neutral, timeless statement, such as just listing where the report is located and that the action items from §給你的行動清單 should be tracked separately.
docs/plans/審批報告-md與html一致性交叉驗證-2026-06-16.md:43 - The legend defines four symbols (✅符合,
⚠️ 部分符合, ❌不符合, 📄文件沒涵蓋), but only⚠️ and ❌ are actually used in the discrepancy tables below. Consider removing the unused symbols to avoid implying there are table rows using them, or adding a note that the full legend is shown for completeness.
docs/plans/審批報告-md與html一致性交叉驗證-2026-06-16.md:3 - There is a full-width ideographic space (U+3000) between
·and方法. The existing README (docs-plans-README.mdline 3) uses a regular space around·(v1.1 · 2026-06-11). For consistency, use a regular space here as well.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
這個 PR 做什麼
新增上一輪「md 規格 ↔ html 原型」一致性交叉驗證審批報告（純文件、不改任何需求/規格/程式碼）。
內容
與 #214 的關係
本 PR 是分析報告；#214 是依此報告強化的「實作紀律與技術債防線」。兩者獨立，可分別 review/merge。