Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

faq: update the inflation bug question #2346

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

HardenedSteel
Copy link
Contributor

make the answer translatable
add moneroinflation.com

closes #2339

make the answer translatable
add moneroinflation.com

closes monero-project#2339
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 14, 2024

Deploy Preview for barolo-time-757cf9 ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1365881
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/barolo-time-757cf9/deploys/66bcf03043245b00081ea758
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2346--barolo-time-757cf9.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@@ -559,6 +561,7 @@ faq:
qtailemission: Why does Monero not have a maximum supply?
atailemission: Miners process transactions on the Monero network by @mining blocks. The miner of a @block is paid the constant block reward of .6 XMR, and the @transaction fees of the users who have transactions in that block. Monero has the block reward rather than relying solely on the transaction fees to give the miners incentive to keep securing the network with their hashrate, and keep transaction fees low.
atailemission1: The @tail-emission caused by this constant block reward creates an inflation rate of less than 1% which trends towards 0% over time. The fixed emission of the currency ensures human corruption cannot over inflate the supply. Keeping the network predictable, decentralized, and secure.
qinflation-bug:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

posts: issue with "About supply auditability"
2 participants