You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2024. It is now read-only.
For some diseases we don't have a lot of information, this makes it even more challenging for a user landing there to know where to go to find more information. While I like the way we are displaying the external resources that are user specific, can we also surface any publications we have?
using any pubs in the definition provenance of the mondo term
using any pubs that are provenance of any d2g associations or other associations
something else, e.g automatic mining of literature
all of the above
in this particular example 1-2 don't yield any pubs. This is maybe something to do to coordinate with mondo, getting pubs in to the ontology? we could also pull in pubs from omim.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
For some diseases we don't have a lot of information, this makes it even more challenging for a user landing there to know where to go to find more information. While I like the way we are displaying the external resources that are user specific, can we also surface any publications we have?
@jmcmurry @nicolevasilevsky
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: