STM32U5 #82
STM32U5 #82
Conversation
| ignored_devices = \ | ||
| [ | ||
| "STM32U59", | ||
| "STM32U5A", | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| def ignoreDevice(device_id: str) -> bool: | ||
| for ignore in ignored_devices: | ||
| if device_id.startswith(ignore): | ||
| return True | ||
| return False |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure if that is the best way to ignore some devices (here: STM32U5{95, 99, A5, A9}) that are not published (yet) and thus are missing datasheet and relevant information.
I my opinion I it not useful to generate device files for this devices so we should somehow ignore them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Meh, doesn't look like we have a choice if the documents are not there. We could guess the memory layout, but then it'll just be a problem later.
|
Looks like ST added yet another type of a completely different DMA implementation ... |
Yes. I ignored DMA completely for now in order to get STM32U5 support merged soon and not to create another PR that will get marked as stale in a few weeks. |
No description provided.