Fixing the Footnotes and Feature Flag on the Function Contracts RFC #2754
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.


Description of changes:
The function contracts RFC as rendered on the website has broken footnotes. The reason is that mdbooks renders markdown differently than GitHub (of course, why would the same syntax, for the same language exhibit the same behavior with two different compilers, that'd just be silly.). Instead of rendering all footnotes at the bottom they were interspersed with the text, breaking the reading flow. In addition the footnotes of mdbook do not support multiple paragraphs and code blocks so one of the footnotes required rephrasing.
Also fixes the incorrectly named
-Zcontractsfeature flagChecklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.