Skip to content

Internal merge 1533#3

Closed
mllwchrry wants to merge 8 commits into
internal-merge-1488from
internal-merge-1533
Closed

Internal merge 1533#3
mllwchrry wants to merge 8 commits into
internal-merge-1488from
internal-merge-1533

Conversation

@mllwchrry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1533: tests: refactor: tidy up util functions (#1491)

theStack and others added 8 commits May 27, 2024 03:09
The rename was done with the following command:

$ sed -i 's/random_group_element_/random_ge_/g' $(git grep -l random_group_element_)
…e_magnitude`

Note that the already existing function `random_fe_magnitude` is removed
and the call-sites are adapted to pass the magnitude range of 8
(the maximum for secp256k1_fe_mul and secp256k1_fe_sqr) explicitly.
Can be reviewed via `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
The rename was done with the following command:

$ sed -i 's/secp256k1_testrand/testrand/g' $(git grep -l secp256k1_testrand)
…tions (#1491)

e73f6f8 tests: refactor: drop `secp256k1_` prefix from testrand.h functions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0ee7453 tests: refactor: add `testutil_` prefix to testutil.h functions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0c6bc76 tests: refactor: move `random_` helpers from tests.c to testutil.h (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0fef847 tests: refactor: rename `random_field_element_magnitude` -> `random_fe_magnitude` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
59db007 tests: refactor: rename `random_group_element_...` -> `random_ge_...` (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  This PR is an attempt at tidying up test util functions, as suggested in #1491. The following changes are done:
  * rename `_group_element...` functions to `_ge...`
  * rename `_field_element...` functions to `_fe...`
  * move `random_` helpers from tests.c to testutil.h (the alternative would be testrand.h, but to my understanding, this one is meant to contain the actual RNG implementation rather than helpers using it; happy to move the helpers there if that is preferred though)
  * prefix testutil.h functions with `testutil_`
  * prefix testrand.h functions with `testrand_` (this is currently done in a sloppy way by simply dropping the `secp256k1_` prefix, so some functions don't have the full prefix, like e.g. `testrand256`; naming suggestions welcome)

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    utACK e73f6f8
  real-or-random:
    utACK e73f6f8

Tree-SHA512: c87a35a9f7f23d4bbb87a1ff0d40dd5fbd7d976719ca1027cad187ac44aa2db3ae887ac620639d2287c260e701a5963830b52048692d3e6b38b5eb6cdf17b854
@mllwchrry mllwchrry closed this Feb 13, 2026
@mllwchrry mllwchrry deleted the internal-merge-1533 branch February 13, 2026 14:00
mllwchrry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2026
…to improve parallelism

8354618 cmake: Set `LABELS` property for tests (Hennadii Stepanov)
29f26ec cmake: Integrate DiscoverTests and normalize test names (Hennadii Stepanov)
f95b263 cmake: Add DiscoverTests module (Hennadii Stepanov)
4ac6511 cmake, refactor: Deduplicate test-related code (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR implements the idea suggested in bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1734 (review) and is based on the work from bitcoin/bitcoin#33483.

  Here is an example of the `ctest` output:
  ```
  $ ctest --test-dir build -j $(nproc)
  Test project /home/hebasto/dev/secp256k1/secp256k1/build
          Start   1: secp256k1.noverify_tests.selftest_tests
          Start   2: secp256k1.noverify_tests.all_proper_context_tests
          Start   3: secp256k1.noverify_tests.all_static_context_tests
          Start   4: secp256k1.noverify_tests.deprecated_context_flags_test
  <snip>
  193/196 Test  #31: secp256k1.noverify_tests.ecmult_constants .........................   Passed    5.32 sec
  194/196 Test BlockstreamResearch#184: secp256k1.tests.ellswift_xdh_correctness_tests ....................   Passed    5.62 sec
  195/196 Test BlockstreamResearch#191: secp256k1.exhaustive_tests ........................................   Passed    6.97 sec
  196/196 Test BlockstreamResearch#126: secp256k1.tests.ecmult_constants ..................................   Passed    9.60 sec

  100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 196

  Label Time Summary:
  secp256k1_example           =   0.02 sec*proc (5 tests)
  secp256k1_exhaustive        =   6.97 sec*proc (1 test)
  secp256k1_noverify_tests    =  23.77 sec*proc (95 tests)
  secp256k1_tests             =  43.67 sec*proc (95 tests)

  Total Test time (real) =  10.21 sec
  ```

  For comparison, here is the output for the master branch on the same machine:
  ```
  $ ctest --test-dir build -j $(nproc)
  Test project /home/hebasto/dev/secp256k1/secp256k1/build
      Start 1: secp256k1_noverify_tests
      Start 2: secp256k1_tests
      Start 3: secp256k1_exhaustive_tests
      Start 4: secp256k1_ecdsa_example
      Start 5: secp256k1_ecdh_example
      Start 6: secp256k1_schnorr_example
      Start 7: secp256k1_ellswift_example
      Start 8: secp256k1_musig_example
  1/8 Test #4: secp256k1_ecdsa_example ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  2/8 Test #5: secp256k1_ecdh_example ...........   Passed    0.00 sec
  3/8 Test #6: secp256k1_schnorr_example ........   Passed    0.00 sec
  4/8 Test #7: secp256k1_ellswift_example .......   Passed    0.00 sec
  5/8 Test #8: secp256k1_musig_example ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  6/8 Test #3: secp256k1_exhaustive_tests .......   Passed    6.26 sec
  7/8 Test #1: secp256k1_noverify_tests .........   Passed   14.31 sec
  8/8 Test #2: secp256k1_tests ..................   Passed   31.65 sec

  100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 8

  Total Test time (real) =  31.65 sec
  ```

  ---

  **New Feature:** As the number of tests has grown, the _labels_ have been introduced to simplify test management. Now, one can run:
  ```
  $ ctest --test-dir build -j $(nproc) -L example
  Test project /home/hebasto/dev/secp256k1/secp256k1/build
      Start 192: secp256k1.example.ecdsa
      Start 193: secp256k1.example.ecdh
      Start 194: secp256k1.example.schnorr
      Start 195: secp256k1.example.ellswift
      Start 196: secp256k1.example.musig
  1/5 Test BlockstreamResearch#192: secp256k1.example.ecdsa ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  2/5 Test BlockstreamResearch#193: secp256k1.example.ecdh ...........   Passed    0.00 sec
  3/5 Test BlockstreamResearch#194: secp256k1.example.schnorr ........   Passed    0.00 sec
  4/5 Test BlockstreamResearch#195: secp256k1.example.ellswift .......   Passed    0.00 sec
  5/5 Test BlockstreamResearch#196: secp256k1.example.musig ..........   Passed    0.00 sec

  100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 5

  Label Time Summary:
  secp256k1_example    =   0.01 sec*proc (5 tests)

  Total Test time (real) =   0.01 sec
  ```
  or
  ```
  $ ctest --test-dir build -j $(nproc) -LE tests
  Test project /home/hebasto/dev/secp256k1/secp256k1/build
      Start 192: secp256k1.example.ecdsa
      Start 193: secp256k1.example.ecdh
      Start 194: secp256k1.example.schnorr
      Start 195: secp256k1.example.ellswift
      Start 196: secp256k1.example.musig
      Start 191: secp256k1.exhaustive_tests
  1/6 Test BlockstreamResearch#192: secp256k1.example.ecdsa ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  2/6 Test BlockstreamResearch#193: secp256k1.example.ecdh ...........   Passed    0.00 sec
  3/6 Test BlockstreamResearch#194: secp256k1.example.schnorr ........   Passed    0.00 sec
  4/6 Test BlockstreamResearch#195: secp256k1.example.ellswift .......   Passed    0.00 sec
  5/6 Test BlockstreamResearch#196: secp256k1.example.musig ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  6/6 Test BlockstreamResearch#191: secp256k1.exhaustive_tests .......   Passed    6.19 sec

  100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 6

  Label Time Summary:
  secp256k1_example       =   0.01 sec*proc (5 tests)
  secp256k1_exhaustive    =   6.19 sec*proc (1 test)

  Total Test time (real) =   6.20 sec
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  purpleKarrot:
    ACK 8354618
  furszy:
    Tested ACK 8354618

Tree-SHA512: 8c506ab08491aba4836b3058a8a09c929c6dd097c11e4e6f4deb20cf602285e73c3fd8a2c2040f7e92a058c7f8fc09752fa9de2ce80f7673adbdd505237ed262
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants