Skip to content

Deere 2.1#1167

Closed
Be-ing wants to merge 82 commits intomixxxdj:masterfrom
Be-ing:deere_2.1
Closed

Deere 2.1#1167
Be-ing wants to merge 82 commits intomixxxdj:masterfrom
Be-ing:deere_2.1

Conversation

@Be-ing
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Be-ing Be-ing commented Feb 3, 2017

Continuation of #940, with new effects UI from #1063 merged.

Be-ing added 30 commits February 2, 2017 20:24
Takes up too much vertical space
and rearrange skin menu a bit
Add new column template for 4 decks + EQs + stacked waveforms
minimum size really depends on which options are selected
@rryan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rryan commented Feb 3, 2017

The commits from #1063 show up in the diff -- did you merge #1063 into this branch or did you merge with master? Could you merge with master or rebase onto master?

@Be-ing
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Feb 3, 2017

I just rebased onto master.

@rryan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rryan commented Feb 3, 2017

I just rebased onto master.

Hm, but all the commits from #1063 show up in this PR as commits to be merged (which suggest you merged #1063 into this branch at some point).

@Be-ing
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Feb 3, 2017

I realized I forgot to fetch upstream before rebasing onto master. Working on rebasing it again now.

@rryan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rryan commented Feb 3, 2017

It seems you merged deere_new_effects into deere_2.1 on Jan 28 f5e35a8 but then subsequently rebased deere_new_effects which gave all of those commits new hashes

e.g. this commit is in master a3c1d80

but this one is in this branch 166b9eb

@Be-ing
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Feb 3, 2017

Turned out to be easier to just merge master into #940, so I'll reopen that.

@Be-ing Be-ing closed this Feb 3, 2017
@Be-ing Be-ing deleted the deere_2.1 branch April 24, 2019 23:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants