Yet more sexps#250
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if this is an error, why not just expose only sexp_of below?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One, to get downstream types to use with sexp and avoid the boilerplate of writing [one side of] it by hand. Two, because this is expected to be fixed eventually (it's in a (* Sexplib stubs *) ... (* *** *) comment block), and it's nice to have the API, even if sketched out.
Note that all these types should be invisible to the outside. This is all basically for tracing/debugging.
|
now that cstruct-1.6.0 is out, could you rebase? then we could merge and be happy.. |
|
And update the opam file constraint at same time as rebase
|
|
thanks! |
Gets rid of the local cstruct pretty-printing code, delegates to the more compact native version.
Merging should probably wait for mirage/ocaml-cstruct#44, but this is what Piñata runs right now.