Skip to content

Improve the task system #747

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
PalmerAL opened this issue May 11, 2019 · 9 comments
Closed

Improve the task system #747

PalmerAL opened this issue May 11, 2019 · 9 comments

Comments

@PalmerAL
Copy link
Collaborator

From #738:

One thing I've been thinking about is changing the task overlay so that tasks are sorted based on how recently you've used them, and tasks you haven't opened in a long time would get collapsed so they don't take up as much space. That way, you could leave tasks open for longer without them getting in the way as much, so that you wouldn't have to delete anything unless you're really sure you don't need it anymore (although the actual state of the pages open would probably be discarded to save memory). But I'm not sure if that would address what you're talking about?

I think I'm going to include a survey about the tasks feature in the next release; it would be good to know what other people think about this as well, since I don't want to disrupt anyone's workflow too badly if they're relying on the existing feature.

Current draft of the survey: https://forms.zohopublic.com/minbrowser/form/Taskssurvey/formperma/b6qx5QWqMx5SW6NSef3sbITA28WE65AujUBvXemZ8YE

I think this could probably work as a link at the top of the task overlay, hopefully it's not too disruptive:

@PalmerAL
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@brakkum I wasn't sure if you had any other thoughts on possible changes, is there anything else you think I should ask?

PalmerAL added a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2019
@PalmerAL PalmerAL pinned this issue May 16, 2019
@PalmerAL PalmerAL changed the title Add a survey about the task system Improve the task system May 30, 2019
@PalmerAL
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think it might be useful to include the date a task was last opened, some possible ways to do that:

@PalmerAL
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PalmerAL commented Jun 19, 2019

The tasks survey has around 20 responses so far, some preliminary results:

("na" means no answer provided)

  • Automatic task sorting is (surprisingly to me) unpopular; it turns out that many people want to organize tasks themselves, so I guess it's probably better not to implement this.
  • Collapsing tasks seems reasonably popular, and I think it doesn't have too many downsides to implement, so I'll probably implement this for the tasks prototype.
  • Adding other content types is much more complex, so I don't think I'll do it for now, but there's enough interest in it that we should consider adding this in the future (if we can figure out a good UI for it).

@swiftmas
Copy link

swiftmas commented Jul 5, 2019

any possiblity of favicons getting worked into tasks? would help track down a tab when your doing fast switching.

@PalmerAL
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PalmerAL commented Jul 8, 2019

I'm kind of skeptical that favicons would help with tab switching; in most cases, I have a bunch of tabs from the same site open anyway, and if you're trying to read the tab titles to find a tab, I think the favicon ends up being distracting more than anything else. But I can definitely add an option for it so we can collect some feedback on it.

@PalmerAL
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PalmerAL commented Jul 8, 2019

I've added a setting to show icons next to each tab in 249dbeb; hopefully this will allow us to collect some feedback on whether this should be included in the final design or not.

@swiftmas
Copy link

swiftmas commented Jul 8, 2019

Awesome! I'll be sure to leave some feedback. I had not thought about your concern and I understand why what might be a problem. I'll let you know.

@dbfreem
Copy link

dbfreem commented Aug 6, 2019

@PalmerAL are you leaving this open for a reason or can it be closed since the PR is merged?

@PalmerAL
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think it's fine to close this, since most of the improvements are done. It might be good to fix some of the things I mentioned in #784 (comment) eventually, but I don't think it has to be done now.

@PalmerAL PalmerAL unpinned this issue Aug 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants