-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 992
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dynamic LMDB mapsize allocation [1.1.0] #2605
Merged
yeastplume
merged 16 commits into
mimblewimble:milestone/1.1.0
from
yeastplume:lmdb_resize
Feb 27, 2019
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ce4d887
dynamically resize lmdb
yeastplume 85d3e27
rustfmt
yeastplume 8ea9d43
explicitly close db before resizing
yeastplume b35bda5
rustfmt
yeastplume 4b2e2f0
merge from 1.1.0 branch
yeastplume 8ba03fd
test fix
yeastplume 5b49a16
rustfmt
yeastplume 4f28272
pool tests
yeastplume 4892e35
merge from latest 1.1.0
yeastplume 7e92a1b
chain fix
yeastplume ebb7513
merge from upstream
yeastplume 0fb3cc5
merge
yeastplume 66e3c78
move RwLock into Store, ensure resize gives a min threshold
yeastplume 1150512
rustfmt
yeastplume 628be78
move locks based on testing
yeastplume b4e360e
rustfmt
yeastplume File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine with the use of a
RwLock
but can't this be pushed down into our LMDB store? All regular operations would be considered a read, except for the close/open of the DB which would take the write.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Took a bit of doing and testing, but think I've managed it in the latest push.