-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 992
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add content disposition for OK responses #2545
add content disposition for OK responses #2545
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this makes sense.
Not sure if we are worried about compatibility here with older clients - I don't see any obvious reasons why this would cause an issue. Unlikely any client was explicitly expecting an empty body in these responses.
While we're cleaning this, shouldn't those return |
You may break more people than it's worth by changing this now. |
@Kargakis |
* - Add backwards compatability - Add hex serialization * rustfmt * rustfmt * Windows Compatibility Fixes #1 (#2535) * initial changes for windows build and unit/integration tests * rustfmt * wallet+store tests * rustfmt * fix linux daemonize * better encapsulate file rename * rustfmt * remove daemonize commands * rustfmt * remove server start/stop commands * add ability to drop pmmr backend files explicitly for txhashset unzip * rustfmt * fix pmmr tests * rustfmt * Windows TUI Fix (#2555) * switch pancurses backend to win32 * revert changes to restore test * compatibility fix + debug messages * rustfmt * Add content disposition for OK responses (#2545) * Testing http send and fixing accordingly * add repost method into wallet owner api (#2553) * add repost method into wallet owner api * rustfmt * Add ability to compare selection strategies (#2516) Before tx creation user can estimate fee and locked amount with different selection strategies by providing `-e` flag for `wallet send` command.
following on to discussions from #2541 this is a smaller PR to fix up the OK responses only