-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
29bca62
commit c5042d7
Showing
7 changed files
with
1,039 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -21,10 +21,287 @@ Those interested to participate, please read the README file and email us at | |
[email protected] | ||
|
||
|
||
Model projections should be submitted via pull request to the | ||
[model-output/](./model-output/) folder and associated metadata should be | ||
submitted at the same time to the [model-metadata/](./model-metadata/) folder | ||
of this GitHub repository. | ||
Technical instructions for submission and required file formats can be found | ||
[here](./model-output/README.md), | ||
[here, for the metadata file](./model_metadata/README.md). | ||
|
||
## Disparities Round | ||
|
||
We observed disparities in COVID-19 outcomes by sociodemographic factors such as | ||
age, location, race/ethnicity, occupation, and socioeconomic status, yet most | ||
epidemiological models do not account for structural inequities that contribute | ||
to differential transmission and severity risk among these groups. This round | ||
aims to build multi-model capacity within the Scenario Modeling Hub to model | ||
and project how disease is distributed differentially among racial/ethnic | ||
subpopulations. A secondary goal is to retrospectively assess the COVID-19 | ||
disease burden that could have been averted if various sources of health | ||
inequities were reduced or mitigated. The round will focus on two US states, | ||
California and North Carolina, where more detailed epidemiological data are | ||
available. | ||
|
||
We have specified a set of scenarios and target outcomes to allow alignment of | ||
model projections for collective insights. Scenarios have been designed in | ||
consultation with academic modeling teams and government agencies (e.g., CDC). | ||
|
||
### Disparities Round Phase 1: Can we accurately predict COVID-19 death disparities by race/ethnicity? | ||
|
||
In Phase 1, teams will calibrate to case and death data by race/ethnicity from | ||
5/1/2020 – 11/14/2020 and project forward 11/15/2020 – 4/3/2021 in a single | ||
Scenario A. Teams are required to incorporate health inequities that contribute | ||
to differential transmission risk and severity by race/ethnicity, where | ||
severity is defined at the probability of death given infection. Teams will be | ||
evaluated on their ability to model race/ethnicity-specific death time series | ||
throughout the projection period in Phase 1. We will assume that we have | ||
prescribed the perfect scenario conditions; thus full information about new | ||
variant circulation, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as masking, | ||
social distancing, and travel restrictions, mobility, and vaccine coverage is | ||
known over the entire projection period. As a result, we will be able to test | ||
the ability of models to project disparities over time, after controlling for | ||
other epidemiological and behavioral uncertainties. Phase 1 features a single | ||
scenario as follows: | ||
|
||
<img src= "./rounds/round1_viz/disparities_phase1.png"> | ||
|
||
### Disparities Round Phase 2: By how much could we have reduced disparities in COVID-19 deaths? | ||
|
||
The goals of Phase 2 are to explore the potential impact of reducing inequities | ||
in transmission risk, severity, or both during the same phase of the pandemic | ||
projected in Phase 1. In Phase 2, teams will be permitted to calibrate from | ||
5/1/2020 – 4/3/2021 to generate projections for Scenario A | ||
(representing empirically observed disparities). This will ensure that teams | ||
have captured disparities accurately throughout the entire time period so that | ||
the impact of reducing sources of inequities can be soundly assessed in | ||
putative Scenarios B-D. | ||
|
||
Thus Scenario A can be interpreted as a fitting exercise as opposed to | ||
projection. | ||
**In Scenario B, we assume that all racial/ethnic populations were able to | ||
mitigate their risk of non-household transmission to the degree of White | ||
populations.** This could have been hypothetically achieved through | ||
increasing personal protective equipment access and social distancing among | ||
essential workers and by increased propensity for telework across | ||
occupational industries. **In Scenario C, we assume that all racial/ethnic | ||
populations experience age-adjusted severity rates upon infection in line | ||
with the White population.** This should be viewed as a hypothetical exercise | ||
in exploring the extent of disease burden that could be averted if long-term | ||
infrastructural changes were made to increase quality healthcare access, | ||
debias healthcare settings to address institutional racism, and expand | ||
institutional/government support systems such as paid leave. **In Scenario D, | ||
we assume that all racial/ethnic populations experience non-household | ||
transmission risk and age-adjusted severity in line with the White | ||
population.** See the round structure below. | ||
|
||
<img src= "./rounds/round1_viz/disparities_phase2.png"> | ||
|
||
### Assumptions | ||
|
||
In this retrospective round, we are interested in assessing the ability of | ||
modeling teams to capture the racial and ethnic distribution of deaths in | ||
California and North Carolina. Therefore, we will provide information on | ||
external circumstances that impacted disease dynamics throughout the projection | ||
period, including new variants, state-specific nonpharmaceutical interventions | ||
(NPIs), mobility, and the ramp up of vaccination during the projection period | ||
November 2020-April 2021. | ||
|
||
|
||
#### New Variants | ||
|
||
|
||
- The Alpha variant B.1.1.7 emerged and replaced the Wuhan strain during the | ||
projection period. Alpha B.1.1.7 became the dominant strain mid-March, and was | ||
reported to be ~40-60% more transmissible than the Wuhan strain with similar | ||
severity ([Sah et al. 2021](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8132270/), | ||
[Yang et al. 2022](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8947836/), | ||
[Ahmad et al. 2022](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448317/), | ||
[Lin et al. 2021](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.775224/full)). | ||
By mid-April 2020, B.1.1.7 represented [66%](https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7023a3.htm?s_cid=mm7023a3_w) | ||
of all sequenced cases in the United States. | ||
|
||
|
||
#### Nonpharmaceutical interventions | ||
|
||
|
||
- [California](https://calmatters.org/health/coronavirus/2021/03/timeline-california-pandemic-year-key-points/) | ||
- Nov 16, 2020: Mask wearing required in all settings outside of the | ||
household and non-essential businesses closed. | ||
- Nov 21, 2020: Curfews from 10pm-5am applied to all non-essential | ||
businesses and households. | ||
- Dec 3, 2020: Regional stay at home orders instituted. | ||
- Jan 25, 2021: Regional stay at home orders and curfew are lifted. | ||
|
||
- [North Carolina](https://www.huschblackwell.com/north-carolina-state-by-state-covid-19-guidance) | ||
- Nov 13, 2020: Indoor gatherings limited to 10 individuals. | ||
- Nov 23, 2020: Masking required in non-household settings. | ||
- December 11, 2020: Curfew instated from 10pm-5am. | ||
- Feb 28, 2021: Curfew lifted, masking and social distancing still | ||
required. | ||
- March 26, 2021: Restrictions on social distancing are lifted, masking | ||
remains in place. | ||
|
||
- Schools were largely closed for the 2020-21 school year in both locations. | ||
|
||
- Weekly SageGraph mobility data is provided at the census tract level, in the | ||
[disparities/mobility/](https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-smh-research_resources/tree/main/disparities#mobility) | ||
folder of | ||
[covid19-smh-research_resources](https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-smh-research_resources) | ||
GitHub Repositories. | ||
Mobility data is sourced from | ||
[Kang et al. 2021](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-00734-5). | ||
|
||
|
||
#### Vaccination | ||
|
||
- Weekly cumulative age- and race/ethnicity-specific vaccination coverage is | ||
provided at the state level in the | ||
[disparities/vaccination/](https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-smh-research_resources/tree/main/disparities#vaccination) | ||
folder of | ||
[covid19-smh-research_resources](https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-smh-research_resources). Vaccination data is extracted from the | ||
[CA DPH](https://data.ca.gov/dataset/covid-19-vaccine-progress-dashboard-data) and | ||
[NCDPH](https://covid19.ncdhhs.gov/dashboard/data-behind-dashboards) vaccine | ||
dashboards and report vaccination by age and race/ethnicity in separate time | ||
series. These dashboards report the number of partially (receiving 1 dose) | ||
and fully vaccinated individuals. We describe the details of the vaccination | ||
rollout and effectiveness assumptions. | ||
|
||
- We summarize race/ethnicity vaccination data by state into the follow | ||
sub-populations: | ||
- California: Latino, White, Asian, Black, Other, Unknown | ||
- North Carolina: White, Asian, Black, Other, Unknown. Note here | ||
that non-White Hispanic individuals are included in “Other.” | ||
|
||
|
||
- Vaccination rollout timelines | ||
1. California | ||
([COVID-19 Vaccination Plan, CADPH](https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/CDPH%20Document%20Library/COVID-19/COVID-19-Vaccination-Plan-California-Interim-Draft_V1.0.pdf), | ||
[California: State-by-State COVID-19 Guidance, Husch Blackwell](https://www.huschblackwell.com/california-state-by-state-covid-19-guidance), | ||
[Vaccines for People with High-Risk Medical Conditions or Disabilities, CADPH](https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/vaccine-high-risk-factsheet.aspx)) | ||
- December 15, 2020: Vaccination begins for Phase 1A. Healthcare workers | ||
and long-term care residents are eligible. | ||
- January 13, 2021: Individuals 65+ years old are eligible for vaccination. | ||
- February 3, 2021: Phase 1B: Essential workers with high exposure risk | ||
(those working in agriculture and food, education and childcare, and | ||
emergency services) are eligible for vaccination. Vaccination sites are | ||
also set up in Oakland and Los Angeles to prioritize communities that have | ||
been heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. | ||
- March 4, 2021: The state announces it will direct 40% of its vaccine supply | ||
to vulnerable communities, based on the Healthy Places Index (HPI). | ||
- March 15, 2021: Individuals <65 and >16 years with high-risk conditions are | ||
eligible for vaccination. | ||
|
||
2. North Carolina | ||
([North Carolina: State-by-State COVID-19 Guidance, Husch Blackwell](https://www.huschblackwell.com/north-carolina-state-by-state-covid-19-guidance)) | ||
- January 20, 2021: Group 1: North Carolinians over the age of 65 and all health | ||
care workers who have in-person contact with patients are eligible for vaccination. | ||
- Feb 9, 2020: Group 2: North Carolina mandates a subset of vaccines must go to every | ||
geographic region and prioritizes vulnerable communities. | ||
- Feb 25, 2021: Teachers and other Group 3 essential workers can get vaccinated. | ||
- March 3, 2021: Additional essential workers in Group 3 can get vaccinated. | ||
- March 24, 2021: People at higher risk from COVID-19 due to underlying medical | ||
conditions will become eligible to receive a vaccine, as will people in certain | ||
congregate-living settings (dorms). | ||
- March 31, 2021: Group 4 eligible for vaccination. Essential workers now include | ||
frontline workers who do not have to be in person for work and those in a range of | ||
sectors such as construction, energy, financial services, public works, and others | ||
as categorized by the | ||
[Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency](https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ECIW_4.0_Guidance_on_Essential_Critical_Infrastructure_Workers_Final3_508_0.pdf). | ||
|
||
|
||
### Calibration Data | ||
|
||
|
||
Weekly case and death data by race/ethnicity are available for phase 1 and 2 in the | ||
[target-data](./target-data/) folder. For more information, please consult the | ||
documentation associated with the | ||
[disparities round target data](https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-smh-research/blob/main/target-data/README.md#disparities-round). | ||
|
||
|
||
### Targets | ||
|
||
In this round, the required target for trajectories will be **weekly incident | ||
infections, cases, and deaths in California and North Carolina for a set of | ||
specified racial/ethnic groups.** Trajectories will need to be paired across | ||
racial/ethnic groups (i.e., for a given model, location, scenario and horizon, | ||
all race/ethnicity data for simulation 1 corresponds to the sum of | ||
race/ethnicity-specific estimates for simulation 1). | ||
|
||
In California, required racial/ethnic groups are `"latino"`, `"black"`, | ||
`"white"`, `"asian"`, and `"other"`, where `"other"` represents American Indian | ||
Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander. | ||
|
||
In North Carolina, required racial/ethnic groups are `"white"`, `"black"`, `"asian"`, | ||
and `"other"`, where `"other"` represents non-White Hispanic and American Indian | ||
Alaska Native. | ||
|
||
Given the missingness in demographic disease data and limited data available on | ||
case reporting rates by race/ethnicity, infections and cases will not be evaluated. | ||
|
||
Teams will be submitting cases and infections for the purpose of model comparison and | ||
weekly death targets will be evaluated. | ||
|
||
### Additional Information | ||
|
||
Auxiliary data and code are available in the | ||
[covid19-smh-research_resources](https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-smh-research_resources) | ||
GitHub repository, | ||
[disparities folder](https://github.com/midas-network/covid19-smh-research_resources/tree/main/disparities) | ||
|
||
The folder contains multiple sub-folders: | ||
|
||
- Case Imputation: imputed case time series by race/ethnicity at the state level to | ||
infer missing case demographic information | ||
- Vaccination: vaccination time series by age and race/ethnicity | ||
- Serology: monthly infection-based and combined vaccination/infection seroprevalence | ||
time series | ||
- Population Data: state-level population structure data by age and race/ethnicity | ||
- Hospitalization: hospitalization time series by race/ethnicity, in a rate per 100,000 | ||
people for California and number of hospitalizations for North Carolina | ||
- Contact Matrix: synthetic daily contact matrices by race/ethnicity in the household, | ||
school, community, workplace setting in the pre-pandemic and pandemic period | ||
|
||
### Submission Information | ||
|
||
| Phase | Type | Scenario | Scenario name | Scenario ID for submission file (`scenario_id`) | | ||
|:--------:|:--------:| ---------------------------------------------- |:-----------------:|:--------------------:| | ||
|1| Projection | Scenario A. Inequity-driven transmission and severity by race/ethnicity | phase_one | A-2020-05-01 | | ||
|2| Calibration | Scenario A. Inequity-driven transmission and severity by race/ethnicity | inTran_inSev | B-2020-11-15 | | ||
|2| Projection | Scenario B. Inequity-mitigated transmission and inequity-driven severity by race/ethnicity | mitTran_inSev | C-2020-11-15 | | ||
|2| Projection | Scenario C. Inequity-driven transmission and inequity-mitigated severity and by race/ethnicity | inTran_mitSev | D-2020-11-15 | | ||
|2| Projection | Scenario D. Inequity-mitigated transmission and inequity-mitigated severity by race/ethnicity | mitTran_mitSev | E-2020-11-15 | | ||
|
||
- End date for fitting data for Phase 1: Saturday November 14, 2020 | ||
- Start date for scenarios: Sunday November 15, 2020 (first date of simulated | ||
transmission/outcomes) | ||
- Simulation end date: April 3, 2021 (20-week horizon) | ||
- **Phase 1 projections due: March 26, 2024** | ||
|
||
##### Submission requirements | ||
|
||
- Must consist of a subset of weekly targets from Sunday, November 15, 2020 - | ||
Saturday, April 3, 2021 (20 week projection period). Weeks follow epi-weeks | ||
(Sun-Sat) dated by the last day of the week. | ||
|
||
- Weekly targets: Weekly incident infections, cases, and deaths by location | ||
and major racial/ethnic group. We require the following racial/ethnic groups | ||
by state: | ||
- California: `"latino"`, `"black"`, `"white"`, `"asian"`, and `"other"`. | ||
- North Carolina: `"black"`, `"white"`, `"asian"`, and `"other"`. | ||
|
||
- 100-300 individual trajectories for each target. Trajectories should be sampled | ||
in such a way that they will be most likely to produce the uncertainty of the | ||
simulated process. | ||
|
||
- Metadata: We will require a brief meta-data from all teams. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Target Data | ||
|
||
The repository contains a [target-data](./target-data/) folder relevant to the modeling efforts. | ||
It contains COVID-19 case and death time series by race/ethnicity. | ||
It contains: | ||
- COVID-19 case and death time series by race/ethnicity for the disparities round. | ||
|
||
For more information, please consult the associated [README file](./target-data/README.md) | ||
|
||
|
Oops, something went wrong.