Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NanoBoyAdvance.NanoBoyAdvance version 1.7.1 #107211

Conversation

superusercode
Copy link
Contributor

@superusercode superusercode commented May 18, 2023

  • Have you signed the Contributor License Agreement?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same manifest update/change?
  • This PR only modifies one (1) manifest
  • Have you validated your manifest locally with winget validate --manifest <path>?
  • Have you tested your manifest locally with winget install --manifest <path>?
  • Does your manifest conform to the 1.4 schema?

Note: <path> is the name of the directory containing the manifest you're submitting.


Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Service Badge  Service Badge  

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

/AzurePipelines run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

/AzurePipelines run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@wingetbot wingetbot added Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Validation-Completed Validation passed labels May 18, 2023
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot enabled auto-merge (squash) May 18, 2023 06:59
@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

superusercode,

The check-in policies require a moderator to approve PRs from the community.

Our moderators are community volunteers, please be patient and allow them sufficient time to review your submission.

Template: msftbot/requiresApproval/moderator

@stephengillie
Copy link
Collaborator

This package installed normally, but errored when launched:

Faulting application name: NanoBoyAdvance.exe, version: 1.7.1.0, time stamp: 0x64629636
Faulting module name: unknown, version: 0.0.0.0, time stamp: 0x00000000 Exception code: 0xc0000005
Fault offset: 0x0000000000000000
Faulting process id: 0x0x1720
Faulting application start time: 0x0x1D989AFECE4518D
Faulting application path: C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WinGet\Packages\NanoBoyAdvance.NanoBoyAdvance__DefaultSource\NanoBoyAdvance.exe
Faulting module path: unknown Report Id: 47cfdecc-e95a-4633-a102-3e29cc1aac06
Faulting package full name:
Faulting package-relative application ID:

@superusercode
Copy link
Contributor Author

due to the vm?

@stephengillie stephengillie added the Needs-Author-Feedback This needs a response from the author. label May 18, 2023
@superusercode
Copy link
Contributor Author

image
installs and launches fine for me locally

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Needs-Attention This work item needs to be reviewed by a member of the core team. and removed Needs-Author-Feedback This needs a response from the author. labels May 19, 2023
@stephengillie
Copy link
Collaborator

image installs and launches fine for me locally

You've got numerous VCRedist and .NET packages that the validation VMs may not. Since the VM is meant to emulate what a new PC might be like, if the user hasn't installed anything yet. For a more accurate troubleshooting perspective, please consider installing a fresh copy of Windows onto a Hyper-V instance, checkpointing it, and installing these there - then resetting to the checkpoint between each install. (And regular Windows Updates and Defender updates of course.) This is environment I'm using, automated with a few scripts.

@superusercode
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll try setting up a virtualbox instance, though I can't use hyperv/windows sandbox since that requires pro last I recall.

@stephengillie
Copy link
Collaborator

Oh - sorry - yes, any virtualization solution should work the same here.

@superusercode
Copy link
Contributor Author

image
clean win11 image on virtualbox runs it without the error

@ItzLevvie
Copy link
Contributor

[Policy] Hardware

@wingetbot wingetbot added the Internal-Error-Dynamic-Scan The test for Dynamic Scanning in the Installation Validation failed. label Dec 20, 2023
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Needs-Attention This work item needs to be reviewed by a member of the core team. Retry-1 flag to indicate retried labels Dec 20, 2023
@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

/AzurePipelines run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot removed Internal-Error-Dynamic-Scan The test for Dynamic Scanning in the Installation Validation failed. Needs-Attention This work item needs to be reviewed by a member of the core team. labels Dec 20, 2023
@wingetbot wingetbot added Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Validation-Executable-Error labels Dec 21, 2023
@ItzLevvie
Copy link
Contributor

@wingetbot run

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

/AzurePipelines run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot removed Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Validation-Executable-Error labels Sep 7, 2024
@wingetbot wingetbot added the Internal-Error-Dynamic-Scan The test for Dynamic Scanning in the Installation Validation failed. label Sep 7, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs-Attention This work item needs to be reviewed by a member of the core team. label Sep 7, 2024
@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

/AzurePipelines run

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot removed Internal-Error-Dynamic-Scan The test for Dynamic Scanning in the Installation Validation failed. Needs-Attention This work item needs to be reviewed by a member of the core team. labels Sep 7, 2024
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ItzLevvie
Copy link
Contributor

[Policy] Blocking-Issue

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Blocking-Issue Manifest validation is blocked by a known issue. label Sep 7, 2024
@wingetbot wingetbot added the Internal-Error-Dynamic-Scan The test for Dynamic Scanning in the Installation Validation failed. label Sep 7, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs-Attention This work item needs to be reviewed by a member of the core team. label Sep 7, 2024
@denelon
Copy link
Contributor

denelon commented Dec 18, 2024

Supporting custom hardware in validation is "Not Planned".

@denelon denelon closed this Dec 18, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot removed the Needs-Attention This work item needs to be reviewed by a member of the core team. label Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Blocking-Issue Manifest validation is blocked by a known issue. Hardware Specific hardware is required - See #199504 Internal-Error-Dynamic-Scan The test for Dynamic Scanning in the Installation Validation failed. Retry-1 flag to indicate retried
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants