Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[openal-soft] Enable NEON on arm64 targets #26452

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 22, 2022

Conversation

stephenjust
Copy link
Member

Turn on Neon support in openal-soft on aarch64 where neon is available as standard.

  • Does your PR follow the maintainer guide?

    Yes

  • If you have added/updated a port: Have you run ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committed the result?

    Yes

github-actions[bot]
github-actions bot previously approved these changes Aug 21, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a new experimental fast check for PR issues. Please let us know if this bot is helpful!

PRs must add only one version and must not modify any published versions

When making any changes to a library, the version or port-version in vcpkg.json or CONTROL must be modified.

error: checked-in files for openal-soft have changed but the version was not updated
version: 1.22.2#3
old SHA: 4c6c030a1e70eb33ebee408e4be3a56a494e8a25
new SHA: a0e8008cd2061bcaeaf0ed725438edae4386aac1
Did you remember to update the version or port version?
Use --overwrite-version to bypass this check
***No files were updated***

@LilyWangLL LilyWangLL added the category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist label Aug 22, 2022
@LilyWangLL LilyWangLL added the info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines label Aug 22, 2022
@JavierMatosD
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@JavierMatosD JavierMatosD merged commit 0f089d0 into microsoft:master Aug 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants