[boringssl] Remove -WX and -Werror

[rpavlik]

…VS2022.

Filed upstream as https://bugs.chromium.org/p/boringssl/issues/detail?id=495

Describe the pull request

• What does your PR fix?

Build of boringssl broken as noted in #24310 (comment)

• Which triplets are supported/not supported? Have you updated the CI baseline?

Only affects windows. Did not update the baseline.

• Does your PR follow the maintainer guide?

Well, it adds a patch for a non-vcpkg-specific problem, but I did file it upstream too.

• If you have added/updated a port: Have you run ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committed the result?

yes

[github-actions]

You have modified or added at least one portfile where deprecated functions are used.

Details

If you feel able to do so, please consider migrating them to the new functions:
vcpkg_install_cmake -> vcpkg_cmake_install (from port vcpkg-cmake)
vcpkg_build_cmake -> vcpkg_cmake_build (from port vcpkg-cmake)
vcpkg_configure_cmake -> vcpkg_cmake_configure (Please remove the option PREFER_NINJA) (from port vcpkg-cmake)
vcpkg_fixup_cmake_targets -> vcpkg_cmake_config_fixup (from port vcpkg-cmake-config)

In the ports that use the new function, you have to add the corresponding dependencies:

{
  "name": "vcpkg-cmake",
  "host": true
},
{
  "name": "vcpkg-cmake-config",
  "host": true
}

The following files are affected:

• ports/boringssl/portfile.cmake

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.

Details

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

• ports/boringssl/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

[LilyWangLL]

Ping @rpavlik

[rpavlik]

Haven't had time to do the requested extra maintenance, and won't for a couple of weeks.

[github-actions]

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.

Details

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

• ports/boringssl/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

[ras0219-msft]

Thanks for the PR!

[github-actions]

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.

Details

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

• ports/boringssl/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

[github-actions]

You have modified or added at least one vcpkg.json where you should check the license field.

Details

If you feel able to do so, please consider adding a "license" field to the following files:

• ports/boringssl/vcpkg.json

Valid values for the license field can be found in the documentation

[ras0219-msft]

Thanks for the PR!