Skip to content

[vcpkg] ci.baseline.txt updates for 2021-09-13#20144

Merged
BillyONeal merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom
BillyONeal:ci-baseline-fixes
Sep 14, 2021
Merged

[vcpkg] ci.baseline.txt updates for 2021-09-13#20144
BillyONeal merged 1 commit intomicrosoft:masterfrom
BillyONeal:ci-baseline-fixes

Conversation

@BillyONeal
Copy link
Member

Most recent CI build: https://dev.azure.com/vcpkg/public/_build/results?buildId=59428

REGRESSION: poppler:arm64-windows. If expected, add poppler:arm64-windows=fail to .\scripts\ci.baseline.txt.
PASSING, REMOVE FROM FAIL LIST: fontconfig:arm64-windows (.\scripts\ci.baseline.txt)

poppler depends on fontconfig, so this isn't actually a regression.

PASSING, REMOVE FROM FAIL LIST: libfreenect2:x64-linux

Most recent CI build: https://dev.azure.com/vcpkg/public/_build/results?buildId=59428

REGRESSION: poppler:arm64-windows. If expected, add poppler:arm64-windows=fail to .\scripts\ci.baseline.txt.
PASSING, REMOVE FROM FAIL LIST: fontconfig:arm64-windows (.\scripts\ci.baseline.txt)

poppler depends on fontconfig, so this isn't actually a regression.

PASSING, REMOVE FROM FAIL LIST: libfreenect2:x64-linux
@BillyONeal BillyONeal added info:internal category:infrastructure Pertaining to the CI/Testing infrastrucutre labels Sep 14, 2021
@autoantwort
Copy link
Contributor

PASSING, REMOVE FROM FAIL LIST: fontconfig:arm64-windows (.\scripts\ci.baseline.txt)

Is something like this also done for ports that are excluded by support expressions?

@PhoebeHui PhoebeHui self-assigned this Sep 14, 2021
@BillyONeal
Copy link
Member Author

Is something like this also done for ports that are excluded by support expressions?

No. This is one of the reasons support expressions need to be related to what upstream says, and why changes due to infrastructure are done in ci.baseline.txt rather than supports.

@autoantwort
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah I only asked because I have seen support expressions like windows & !windows but the package build without an error on windows (there are some other examples in #20053). So it would have been cool if the ci reported that the support expression is to restrictive.

@BillyONeal BillyONeal merged commit 0209a27 into microsoft:master Sep 14, 2021
@BillyONeal BillyONeal deleted the ci-baseline-fixes branch September 14, 2021 23:02
Jimmy-Hu added a commit to Jimmy-Hu/vcpkg that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2021
[vcpkg] ci.baseline.txt updates for 2021-09-13 (microsoft#20144)
@cenit
Copy link
Contributor

cenit commented Sep 15, 2021

windows & !windows was for directx legacy port? it was done to avoid building in CI and to express its legacy nature

@autoantwort
Copy link
Contributor

Yes. But we can't do that in the future with microsoft/vcpkg-tool#184. If one want to express deprecation we should introduce a deprecated field.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

category:infrastructure Pertaining to the CI/Testing infrastrucutre

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants