Conversation
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Co-authored-by: NancyLi1013 <46708020+NancyLi1013@users.noreply.github.com>
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
I tried to build Should I remove |
|
Could you please provide |
This is the file: Here you can find additional files: According to the fatal error in There seems that the error is related to Thank you very much for your support. |
|
On the other hand, the error on vcpkg/ports/cppad/portfile.cmake Line 33 in 7803ab5 Indeed the This is an example of the file generated on my PC when however, since Possible solutions are:
What do you prefer? @NancyLi1013 |
I think that is a bug in |
|
Prefix must be defined. Patch the *.pc file if it is not defined in there. pkg-config does not work if the prefix is not defined (with a few exceptions). |
34ce3a7 should fix the pkg-config issue Associated issue: coin-or/CppAD#62 |
|
Hi @GiulioRomualdi You might need to check this again. |
|
Here I would like to recap the failures in the CI:
What do you suggest @NancyLi1013? |
|
Hi @GiulioRomualdi For the failures on arm64-windows, it is due to this: For x64-uwp and arm-uwp, it is due to this: These should be bug. You might post these issues to upstream. Or you can add unsupported messages for |
|
For the regressions on x64-windows, I will try to reproduce it on my local to confirm if it is a bug. |
|
Thanks @NancyLi1013 for the support. I've just opened two issues on the original project to check track the problem:
In the meantime, I will
|
|
That's strange. Now
Here the artifact generated: x64-windows port build failure logs.zip |
|
For the failure on For x64-windows, you can add |
|
LGTM now. If the two patches in this PR can be accepted by upstream, it will be perfect. The support for |
Since I'm not the maintainer of |
What does your PR fix? Fixes [New Port Request] CppAD #12522
Which triplets are supported/not supported? Have you updated the CI baseline? All the triplets should be supported.
Does your PR follow the maintainer guide? yes.
@traversaro @S-Dafarra