Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature Request : Make BackgroundImage avaliable for websites #1936

Closed
SJang1 opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature Request : Make BackgroundImage avaliable for websites #1936

SJang1 opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
Area-Extensibility A feature that would ideally be fulfilled by us having an extension model. Area-TerminalControl Issues pertaining to the terminal control (input, selection, keybindings, mouse interaction, etc.) Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. Product-Terminal The new Windows Terminal. Resolution-Won't-Fix We're just really obstinate about this. There's probably a good reason.
Milestone
Terminal Backlog

Comments

@SJang1
Copy link

SJang1 commented Jul 12, 2019

Summary of the new feature/enhancement

Make BackgroundImage avaliable(load) not for only image, also can load websites or html file but just like a image. (Not avaliable to click or type in. It is terminal, not web browser)
( ~~ So I can load like clock website to see the time in the terminal ~~ )

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

BackgroundImage also loads website, local html file, etc.. whatever it could be loaded.
@ghost ghost added Needs-Triage It's a new issue that the core contributor team needs to triage at the next triage meeting Needs-Tag-Fix Doesn't match tag requirements labels Jul 12, 2019
@zadjii-msft zadjii-msft added Area-Extensibility A feature that would ideally be fulfilled by us having an extension model. Area-TerminalControl Issues pertaining to the terminal control (input, selection, keybindings, mouse interaction, etc.) Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. Product-Terminal The new Windows Terminal. labels Jul 12, 2019
@ghost ghost removed the Needs-Tag-Fix Doesn't match tag requirements label Jul 12, 2019
@zadjii-msft zadjii-msft added this to the Terminal Backlog milestone Jul 12, 2019
@zadjii-msft
Copy link
Member

I don't think this is a terrible idea. It kinda plays into the idea we were discussing in another thread about having a "stack" of backgrounds.

Might make more sense as an extension, though I guess that's something to work out when we're designing that.

@trigger-segfault trigger-segfault mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2019
Closed
@DHowett-MSFT
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for the suggestion. This isn't something we're going to be pursuing for a while, and it looks like it might not be possible with our architecture today.
I'm going to close this out. Sorry!

@DHowett-MSFT DHowett-MSFT added Resolution-Won't-Fix We're just really obstinate about this. There's probably a good reason. and removed Needs-Triage It's a new issue that the core contributor team needs to triage at the next triage meeting labels Jul 22, 2019
@trigger-segfault trigger-segfault mentioned this issue Aug 12, 2019
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Area-Extensibility A feature that would ideally be fulfilled by us having an extension model. Area-TerminalControl Issues pertaining to the terminal control (input, selection, keybindings, mouse interaction, etc.) Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. Product-Terminal The new Windows Terminal. Resolution-Won't-Fix We're just really obstinate about this. There's probably a good reason.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Terminal Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@DHowett-MSFT @zadjii-msft @SJang1