Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

causal_manager.py: Move user config validation checks from compute() to add() #2342

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

gaugup
Copy link
Contributor

@gaugup gaugup commented Sep 15, 2023

Description

It looks like these checks should be part to add() so stop the unnecessary compute() execution.

Checklist

  • I have added screenshots above for all UI changes.
  • I have added e2e tests for all UI changes.
  • Documentation was updated if it was needed.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2342 (5a30afe) into main (0a45661) will increase coverage by 2.10%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2342      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.58%   90.68%   +2.10%     
==========================================
  Files         134       59      -75     
  Lines        7631     2330    -5301     
==========================================
- Hits         6760     2113    -4647     
+ Misses        871      217     -654     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.68% <ø> (+2.10%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 75 files with indirect coverage changes

@gaugup gaugup enabled auto-merge (squash) September 19, 2023 17:41
@gaugup gaugup merged commit e3cbcfd into main Sep 19, 2023
@gaugup gaugup deleted the gaugup/MoveCasualValidationChecks branch September 19, 2023 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants