Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[js/common] allow import onnxruntime-common as ESM and CJS #15772

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 12, 2023

Conversation

fs-eire
Copy link
Contributor

@fs-eire fs-eire commented May 2, 2023

Description

allow import onnxruntime-common as ESM and CJS.

@fs-eire fs-eire mentioned this pull request May 2, 2023
js/common/build.js Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
@fs-eire fs-eire force-pushed the fs-eire/js-common-module branch from b9ec25d to 1d23564 Compare May 2, 2023 07:14
@fs-eire
Copy link
Contributor Author

fs-eire commented May 3, 2023

Hold this commit. Please merge it after ORT 1.15.0 release.

@fs-eire
Copy link
Contributor Author

fs-eire commented May 8, 2023

This should be merged after #15843

guschmue
guschmue previously approved these changes Jun 9, 2023
fs-eire added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2023
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->

refactor tensor type in onnxruntime-common.

### Motivation and Context
There major motivation is that I am doing a local change to address the
API part of #15312. And I am doing a refactoring of onnxruntime-common
anyway (#15772).

The `tensor.ts` and `tensor-impl.ts` are too large, so I split contents
into multiple files to make the type declarations clearer.

The original target of this change is for API only ( ie. do not refactor
any implementation.). However, there are a few type/implementation
inconsistencies so I also made minimal changes to fix them.

### Changes
- extract `TensorUtils` for non-template interfaces
- extract `TensorFactory` for all overloads of `Tensor.fromImage()`
- refactor options type that used for `Tensor.fromImage()`
- fix JSDoc comments to make option descriptions consistent with actual
type declarations
- fix an inconsistency for `options.format` and `options.bitmapFormat`;
change all `bitmapFormat` to `format`
- extract `ConversionUtils` for `tensor.toDataURL()` and
`tensor.toImageData()`
- put implementations into multiple files from `tensor-impl.ts`
- fix a bug that cause unittest fail. put comments for future fix.
@fs-eire fs-eire merged commit e3e4926 into main Jun 12, 2023
@fs-eire fs-eire deleted the fs-eire/js-common-module branch June 12, 2023 19:05
siweic0 pushed a commit to siweic0/onnxruntime-web that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
### Description
<!-- Describe your changes. -->

refactor tensor type in onnxruntime-common.

### Motivation and Context
There major motivation is that I am doing a local change to address the
API part of microsoft#15312. And I am doing a refactoring of onnxruntime-common
anyway (microsoft#15772).

The `tensor.ts` and `tensor-impl.ts` are too large, so I split contents
into multiple files to make the type declarations clearer.

The original target of this change is for API only ( ie. do not refactor
any implementation.). However, there are a few type/implementation
inconsistencies so I also made minimal changes to fix them.

### Changes
- extract `TensorUtils` for non-template interfaces
- extract `TensorFactory` for all overloads of `Tensor.fromImage()`
- refactor options type that used for `Tensor.fromImage()`
- fix JSDoc comments to make option descriptions consistent with actual
type declarations
- fix an inconsistency for `options.format` and `options.bitmapFormat`;
change all `bitmapFormat` to `format`
- extract `ConversionUtils` for `tensor.toDataURL()` and
`tensor.toImageData()`
- put implementations into multiple files from `tensor-impl.ts`
- fix a bug that cause unittest fail. put comments for future fix.
siweic0 pushed a commit to siweic0/onnxruntime-web that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
…#15772)

### Description
allow import onnxruntime-common as ESM and CJS.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants