-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
Have optional callback in focusZoneProps to determine if scenario owner wants the input element to lose the focus on arrow key #4290
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b6e47f9
Test
sayali26 a3e9c76
Scenario determines if to loose focus or not
sayali26 cd8705b
update
sayali26 262634f
PR comment
sayali26 e229a77
Add returns
sayali26 ed17e96
Add test
sayali26 abd0b7a
update test
sayali26 c1c3da1
Update change log
sayali26 446d2e6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into sayali/arrowFocusFix
sayali26 995f35b
Increase bundle maxsize
sayali26 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@ export interface IFocusZoneProps extends React.HTMLAttributes<HTMLElement | Focu | |
| */ | ||
| handleTabKey?: FocusZoneTabbableElements; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * A callback method to determine if the input element should lose focus on arrow keys | ||
| * @param {HTMLInputElement} inputElement The input element which is to loose focus. | ||
| */ | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. add default value down here.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. not sure if we could add default value to the callback method. Added @returns |
||
| shouldInputLoseFocusOnArrowKey?: (inputElement: HTMLInputElement) => boolean; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Whether the to check for data-no-horizontal-wrap or data-no-vertical-wrap attributes | ||
| * when determining how to move focus | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't love that the const shouldInputLoseFocusOnArrowKey is a boolean, but this.props.shouldInputLoseFocusOnArrowKey is a function returning a boolean.
Can we either move this function down to 822, or come up with a different name stating that this is the result of the function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have addressed this comment