Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add details about GAIA benchmark evaluation #3433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

Add details about GAIA benchmark evaluation #3433

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions TRANSPARENCY_FAQS.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ While AutoGen automates LLM workflows, decisions about how to use specific LLM o
- Current version of AutoGen was evaluated on six applications to illustrate its potential in simplifying the development of high-performance multi-agent applications. These applications are selected based on their real-world relevance, problem difficulty and problem solving capabilities enabled by AutoGen, and innovative potential.
- These applications involve using AutoGen to solve math problems, question answering, decision making in text world environments, supply chain optimization, etc. For each of these domains AutoGen was evaluated on various success based metrics (i.e., how often the AutoGen based implementation solved the task). And, in some cases, AutoGen based approach was also evaluated on implementation efficiency (e.g., to track reductions in developer effort to build). More details can be found at: https://aka.ms/AutoGen/TechReport
- The team has conducted tests where a “red” agent attempts to get the default AutoGen assistant to break from its alignment and guardrails. The team has observed that out of 70 attempts to break guardrails, only 1 was successful in producing text that would have been flagged as problematic by Azure OpenAI filters. The team has not observed any evidence that AutoGen (or GPT models as hosted by OpenAI or Azure) can produce novel code exploits or jailbreak prompts, since direct prompts to “be a hacker”, “write exploits”, or “produce a phishing email” are refused by existing filters.
- We also evaluated [a team of AutoGen agents](https://github.com/microsoft/autogen/tree/gaia_multiagent_v01_march_1st/samples/tools/autogenbench/scenarios/GAIA/Templates/Orchestrator) on the [GAIA benchmarks](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12983), and got [SOTA results](https://huggingface.co/spaces/gaia-benchmark/leaderboard) as of
March 1, 2024.

## What are the limitations of AutoGen? How can users minimize the impact of AutoGen’s limitations when using the system?
AutoGen relies on existing LLMs. Experimenting with AutoGen would retain common limitations of large language models; including:
Expand Down
Loading