Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions src/frontend/config/sidebar/docs.topics.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1083,6 +1083,10 @@ export const docsTopics: StarlightSidebarTopicsUserConfig = {
ja: 'カスタム リソース URL',
},
},
{
label: 'Multi-language integrations',
slug: 'extensibility/multi-language-integration-authoring',
},
],
},
{
Expand Down

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this arrticle falls under the extensibility node in the sidebar, we should link to it from the other TypeScript AppHost articles.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
---
title: Multi-language integrations
description: Learn how to annotate your Aspire hosting integration so it works with TypeScript AppHosts.
---

import { Aside, Code, Steps, Tabs, TabItem } from '@astrojs/starlight/components';
Comment thread
IEvangelist marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
import LearnMore from '@components/LearnMore.astro';

Comment thread
IEvangelist marked this conversation as resolved.
Aspire hosting integrations are C# libraries that extend the AppHost with new resource types. By default, these integrations are only available in C# AppHosts. To make them available in TypeScript AppHosts, you annotate your APIs with ATS (Aspire Type System) attributes.

This guide walks you through the process of exporting your integration for multi-language use.

## How it works

When a TypeScript AppHost adds your integration, the Aspire CLI:

<Steps>

1. Loads your integration assembly
2. Scans for `[AspireExport]` attributes on methods, types, and properties
Comment thread
IEvangelist marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
3. Generates a typed TypeScript SDK with matching methods
4. The generated SDK communicates with your C# code via JSON-RPC at runtime

</Steps>

Your C# code runs as-is — the TypeScript SDK is a thin client that calls into it. You don't need to rewrite anything in TypeScript.

## Install the analyzer

The `Aspire.Hosting.Integration.Analyzers` package provides build-time validation that catches common export mistakes. Add it to your integration project:
Comment thread
IEvangelist marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

```xml title="XML — MyIntegration.csproj"
<PackageReference Include="Aspire.Hosting.Integration.Analyzers" Version="13.2.0">
<PrivateAssets>all</PrivateAssets>
<IncludeAssets>runtime; build; native; contentfiles; analyzers</IncludeAssets>
</PackageReference>
```

The analyzer reports 10 diagnostics (ASPIREEXPORT001–010) that help you get your exports right before users encounter runtime errors.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should explicitly call out the number of diagnostics, as that's fragile. Instead, say more generically that there are a number of diagnostics available, and perhaps detail some of the common scenarios these diagnostics cover/handle.

We'll also need to add these diagnostic articles to the existing /diagnostics/overview/ and create a new article per diagnostic following the existing patterns.

It also seems like we need a ASPIREATS001 diag article too.


## Export extension methods

Add `[AspireExport]` to your `Add*`, `With*`, and `Run*` extension methods. The attribute takes a method name that becomes the TypeScript API:

```csharp title="C# — MyDatabaseBuilderExtensions.cs"
#pragma warning disable ASPIREATS001 // ATS types are experimental

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe suggest to discard this warning in the csproj?


[AspireExport("addMyDatabase", Description = "Adds a MyDatabase container resource")]
public static IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseResource> AddMyDatabase(
this IDistributedApplicationBuilder builder,
[ResourceName] string name,
int? port = null)
{
// Your existing implementation...
}

[AspireExport("addDatabase", Description = "Adds a database to the MyDatabase server")]
public static IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseDatabaseResource> AddDatabase(
this IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseResource> builder,
[ResourceName] string name,
string? databaseName = null)
{
// Your existing implementation...
}

[AspireExport("withDataVolume", Description = "Adds a data volume to the MyDatabase server")]
public static IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseResource> WithDataVolume(
this IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseResource> builder,
string? name = null)
{
// Your existing implementation...
}
```

This generates the following TypeScript API:
Comment thread
IEvangelist marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated

```typescript title="TypeScript — Generated SDK"
Comment thread
IEvangelist marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
const db = await builder
.addMyDatabase("db", { port: 5432 })
.addDatabase("mydata")
.withDataVolume();
Comment thread
IEvangelist marked this conversation as resolved.
```

<Aside type="tip" title="Naming convention">
The export ID becomes the method name in generated SDKs. Use camelCase (e.g., `addMyDatabase`, `withDataVolume`). The full capability ID is computed as `{AssemblyName}/{methodName}` — for example, `MyCompany.Hosting.MyDatabase/addMyDatabase`.
</Aside>

## Export resource types

Mark your resource types with `[AspireExport]` so the TypeScript SDK can reference them as typed handles:

```csharp title="C# — MyDatabaseResource.cs"
[AspireExport]
public sealed class MyDatabaseResource(string name)
: ContainerResource(name), IResourceWithConnectionString
{
// Your existing implementation...
}

[AspireExport]

@IEvangelist IEvangelist Mar 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should have an example that uses ExposeMethods and ExposeProperties set to true, detailing what they are/what they do and when to use them. In fact, there are several other properties on this attribute that should be detailed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most resources should have ExportProperties = true

public sealed class MyDatabaseDatabaseResource(string name, MyDatabaseResource parent)
: Resource(name)
{
// Your existing implementation...
}
```

## Export configuration DTOs

If your integration accepts structured configuration, mark the options class with `[AspireDto]`. DTOs are serialized as JSON between the TypeScript AppHost and the .NET runtime:

```csharp title="C# — MyDatabaseOptions.cs"
[AspireDto]
public sealed class AddMyDatabaseOptions
{
public required string Name { get; init; }
public int? Port { get; init; }
public string? ImageTag { get; init; }
}
```

<Aside type="note">
DTOs must have properties that can be serialized to/from JSON. Don't use complex .NET types like `IConfiguration`, `ILogger`, or delegates in DTOs.
Comment thread
IEvangelist marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
</Aside>

## Handle incompatible overloads

Some C# overloads use types that can't be represented in TypeScript (e.g., `Action<T>` delegates with non-serializable contexts, interpolated string handlers, or C#-specific types). Mark these with `[AspireExportIgnore]`:

```csharp title="C# — Exclude incompatible overloads"
// This overload works in TypeScript — simple parameters
[AspireExport("withConnectionStringLimit", Description = "Sets connection limit")]
public static IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseResource> WithConnectionStringLimit(
this IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseResource> builder,
int maxConnections)
{
// ...
}

// This overload uses a C#-specific type — exclude it
[AspireExportIgnore(Reason = "ForwarderConfig is not ATS-compatible. Use the DTO-based overload.")]
public static IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseResource> WithConnectionStringLimit(
this IResourceBuilder<MyDatabaseResource> builder,
ForwarderConfig config)
{
// ...
}
```

<Aside type="caution">
The analyzer (ASPIREEXPORT008) warns when public extension methods on exported types lack either `[AspireExport]` or `[AspireExportIgnore]`. Every public method must be explicitly exported or excluded.
</Aside>

## Union types

When a parameter accepts multiple types, use `[AspireUnion]` to declare the valid options:

```csharp title="C# — Union type parameter"
[AspireExport("withEnvironment", Description = "Sets an environment variable")]
public static IResourceBuilder<T> WithEnvironment<T>(
this IResourceBuilder<T> builder,
string name,
[AspireUnion(typeof(string), typeof(ReferenceExpression), typeof(EndpointReference))]
object value)
where T : IResourceWithEnvironment
{
// ...
}
```

All types in the union must be ATS-compatible. The analyzer (ASPIREEXPORT005, ASPIREEXPORT006) validates union declarations at build time.

## Analyzer diagnostics

The `Aspire.Hosting.Integration.Analyzers` package reports these diagnostics:

| ID | Severity | Description |
|----|----------|-------------|
| ASPIREEXPORT001 | Error | `[AspireExport]` method must be static |
| ASPIREEXPORT002 | Error | Invalid export ID format (must match `[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9.]*`) |
| ASPIREEXPORT003 | Error | Return type is not ATS-compatible |
| ASPIREEXPORT004 | Error | Parameter type is not ATS-compatible |
| ASPIREEXPORT005 | Warning | `[AspireUnion]` requires at least 2 types |
| ASPIREEXPORT006 | Warning | Union type is not ATS-compatible |
| ASPIREEXPORT007 | Warning | Duplicate export ID for the same target type |
| ASPIREEXPORT008 | Warning | Public extension method on exported type missing `[AspireExport]` or `[AspireExportIgnore]` |
| ASPIREEXPORT009 | Warning | Export name may collide with other integrations |
| ASPIREEXPORT010 | Warning | Synchronous callback invoked inline — may deadlock in multi-language app hosts |

A clean build with zero analyzer warnings means your integration is ready for multi-language use.

## Third-party integrations

If your integration doesn't reference `Aspire.Hosting` directly (or you want to avoid a version dependency on the attribute types), you can define your own copies of the ATS attributes. The scanner discovers attributes by **full type name**, not by assembly reference.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Curious about this, how can you be an Aspire hosting integration without depending on Aspire.Hosting? Also, if this is such a concern - why not leave the abstractions, attributes, etc. in their own separate assembly?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, tbh this isn't interesting to add, it's an implementation detail.


Copy these attribute definitions into your project. They must be in the `Aspire.Hosting` namespace:

<Tabs syncKey="attribute-defs">
<TabItem label="AspireExportAttribute">

```csharp title="C# — AspireExportAttribute.cs"
namespace Aspire.Hosting;

[AttributeUsage(
AttributeTargets.Method | AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Interface
| AttributeTargets.Assembly | AttributeTargets.Property,
Inherited = false,
AllowMultiple = true)]
public sealed class AspireExportAttribute : Attribute
{
public AspireExportAttribute(string id) => Id = id;
public AspireExportAttribute() { }
public AspireExportAttribute(Type type) => Type = type;

public string? Id { get; }
public Type? Type { get; set; }
public string? Description { get; set; }
public string? MethodName { get; set; }
public bool ExposeProperties { get; set; }
public bool ExposeMethods { get; set; }
}
```

</TabItem>
<TabItem label="AspireExportIgnoreAttribute">

```csharp title="C# — AspireExportIgnoreAttribute.cs"
namespace Aspire.Hosting;

[AttributeUsage(
AttributeTargets.Property | AttributeTargets.Method,
Inherited = false,
AllowMultiple = false)]
public sealed class AspireExportIgnoreAttribute : Attribute
{
public string? Reason { get; set; }
}
```

</TabItem>
<TabItem label="AspireDtoAttribute">

```csharp title="C# — AspireDtoAttribute.cs"
namespace Aspire.Hosting;

[AttributeUsage(
AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Struct,
Inherited = false,
AllowMultiple = false)]
public sealed class AspireDtoAttribute : Attribute
{
public string? DtoTypeId { get; set; }
}
```

</TabItem>
<TabItem label="AspireUnionAttribute">

```csharp title="C# — AspireUnionAttribute.cs"
namespace Aspire.Hosting;

[AttributeUsage(
AttributeTargets.Parameter | AttributeTargets.Property,
AllowMultiple = false)]
public sealed class AspireUnionAttribute : Attribute
{
public AspireUnionAttribute(params Type[] types) => Types = types;
public Type[] Types { get; }
}
```

</TabItem>
</Tabs>

<Aside type="caution" title="Namespace and signature requirements">
The attributes **must** be in the `Aspire.Hosting` namespace. Constructor signatures must match by arity and argument type. Property names must match exactly. If you later add a reference to `Aspire.Hosting` and both attribute copies exist, the scanner takes the first match — both are recognized.
</Aside>

## Local development with project references

You can test your integration locally without publishing to a NuGet feed. In your TypeScript AppHost's `aspire.config.json`, set the package value to a `.csproj` path instead of a version number:

```json title="JSON — aspire.config.json"
{
"appHost": {
"path": "apphost.ts",
"language": "typescript/nodejs"
},
"packages": {
"Aspire.Hosting.Redis": "13.2.0",
"MyCompany.Hosting.MyDatabase": "../src/MyCompany.Hosting.MyDatabase/MyCompany.Hosting.MyDatabase.csproj"
}
}
```

When the CLI detects a `.csproj` path, it builds the project locally and generates the TypeScript SDK from the resulting assemblies. This lets you iterate on your exports without publishing to a feed.

<Aside type="note">
Project references require the .NET SDK to be installed (for `dotnet build`). The NuGet-only path (version strings) does not require the .NET SDK.
</Aside>

## Test your exports

<Steps>

1. Create a TypeScript AppHost for testing:

```bash title="Create test AppHost"
mkdir test-apphost && cd test-apphost
aspire init --language typescript
```

2. Add your integration via project reference in `aspire.config.json`:

```json title="JSON — aspire.config.json (packages section)"
{
"packages": {
"MyCompany.Hosting.MyDatabase": "../src/MyCompany.Hosting.MyDatabase/MyCompany.Hosting.MyDatabase.csproj"
}
}
```

3. Run `aspire run` to generate the TypeScript SDK:

```bash title="Generate SDK and start"
aspire run
```

4. Check the generated `.modules/` directory for your integration's TypeScript types. Verify that your exported methods appear with the correct signatures.

5. Use the generated API in `apphost.ts`:

```typescript title="TypeScript — apphost.ts"
import { createBuilder } from './.modules/aspire.js';

const builder = await createBuilder();

const db = await builder
.addMyDatabase("db", { port: 5432 })
.addDatabase("mydata")
.withDataVolume();

await builder.build().run();
```

</Steps>

## Supported types

The following types are ATS-compatible and can be used in exported method signatures:

| Category | Types |
|----------|-------|
| **Primitives** | `string`, `bool`, `int`, `long`, `float`, `double`, `decimal` |
| **Value types** | `DateTime`, `TimeSpan`, `Guid`, `Uri` |
| **Enums** | Any enum type |
| **Handles** | `IResourceBuilder<T>`, `IDistributedApplicationBuilder`, resource types marked with `[AspireExport]` |
| **DTOs** | Classes/structs marked with `[AspireDto]` |
| **Collections** | `List<T>`, `Dictionary<string, T>`, arrays — where `T` is ATS-compatible |
| **Special** | `ParameterResource`, `ReferenceExpression`, `EndpointReference`, `CancellationToken` |
| **Nullable** | Any of the above as nullable (`T?`) |

Types that are **not** ATS-compatible include: `Action<T>`, `Func<T>`, `IConfiguration`, `ILogger` (unless explicitly exported), interpolated string handlers, and custom complex types without `[AspireExport]` or `[AspireDto]`.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't that mostly wrong statements?

Most delegates are compatible. ILogger and even IServiceProvider are already exported. We might have some exports today that were not because of these, but we'll revisit them in 13.2.1 or 13.3 because in the meantime it has been aded.

Also Action maybe require the RunAsBackgroundSoemthing when it's invoked inline (and not referenced as a later callback)


## See also

- [TypeScript AppHost](/app-host/typescript-apphost/) — Getting started with TypeScript AppHosts
- [Custom resources](/extensibility/custom-resources/) — Creating custom resource types
- [Integrations overview](/integrations/overview/) — Available integrations