-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 452
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modify PrepFunctionalTests.sh to work out of the output directories #427
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it necessary to actually copy? Couldn't we just update the init script to set the
GITPATH
variable appropriately?Two concerns with this:
VFS_PUBLISHDIR
currently contains just the outputs ofdotnet publish GVFS.sln
. With this change, that publish folder will now contain different contents if I build+publish from VS or build+publish with this script. So if we do need to copy, I'd say copy the Git package to a parallel folder, not inside the same publish folder.Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not a fan of that, since it means we need to sweep up the packages (which I view as build input) and pass it between jobs. I think that if we need something in a package available to end users, the build should promote it to an output folder.
Makes sense to me. I'll make that change.
Also makes sense. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To add one more element here - today I can do a clean build+publish from VS, then run the prep script, and then run the functional tests.
With this change, we would now require that the build happen via this build script, at least once. It would be nice to keep the ability to build from VS if possible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sanoursa and I agreed offline that, unfortunately, clean build+publish from VS already doesn't work, and the build script is already a prereq. I'm adding to the problem here. We'll move more of this into the build phase itself in subsequent refactorings, but it's deferred while we work on moving to yaml pipelines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good to me. Note that I plan to spend some time next week digging into getting our build working well in VSMac (or at least understanding why things don't work well today).