-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Support spread operator in call expressions #1931
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@ module ts { | |
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| // _a .. _h, _j ... _z, _0, _1, ... | ||
| name = "_" + (tempCount < 25 ? String.fromCharCode(tempCount + (tempCount < 8 ? 0: 1) + CharacterCodes.a) : tempCount - 25); | ||
| name = "_" + (tempCount < 25 ? String.fromCharCode(tempCount + (tempCount < 8 ? 0 : 1) + CharacterCodes.a) : tempCount - 25); | ||
| tempCount++; | ||
| } | ||
| var result = <Identifier>createNode(SyntaxKind.Identifier); | ||
|
|
@@ -2350,22 +2350,10 @@ module ts { | |
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function emitArrayLiteral(node: ArrayLiteralExpression) { | ||
| var elements = node.elements; | ||
| var length = elements.length; | ||
| if (length === 0) { | ||
| write("[]"); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| if (languageVersion >= ScriptTarget.ES6) { | ||
| write("["); | ||
| emitList(elements, 0, elements.length, /*multiLine*/(node.flags & NodeFlags.MultiLine) !== 0, | ||
| /*trailingComma*/ elements.hasTrailingComma); | ||
| write("]"); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| function emitListWithSpread(elements: Expression[], multiLine: boolean, trailingComma: boolean) { | ||
| var pos = 0; | ||
| var group = 0; | ||
| var length = elements.length; | ||
| while (pos < length) { | ||
| // Emit using the pattern <group0>.concat(<group1>, <group2>, ...) | ||
| if (group === 1) { | ||
|
|
@@ -2386,8 +2374,7 @@ module ts { | |
| i++; | ||
| } | ||
| write("["); | ||
| emitList(elements, pos, i - pos, /*multiLine*/ (node.flags & NodeFlags.MultiLine) !== 0, | ||
| /*trailingComma*/ elements.hasTrailingComma); | ||
| emitList(elements, pos, i - pos, multiLine, trailingComma); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think passing trailingComma is not quite correct here. Passing it means that if the entire list has a trailing comma, then each non-spread group has a trailing comma, rather than just the last one. But I don't think it makes a difference semantically. At least, I cannot think of a case where it would.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You're right. I think I'll just get rid of the trailingComma parameter. Given we're substantially rewriting the original code here there's really no point in preserving this detail. |
||
| write("]"); | ||
| pos = i; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
@@ -2398,6 +2385,23 @@ module ts { | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function emitArrayLiteral(node: ArrayLiteralExpression) { | ||
| var elements = node.elements; | ||
| if (elements.length === 0) { | ||
| write("[]"); | ||
| return; | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think for this function I prefer if...else if... else, instead of returning.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Will do. |
||
| } | ||
| if (languageVersion >= ScriptTarget.ES6) { | ||
| write("["); | ||
| emitList(elements, 0, elements.length, /*multiLine*/(node.flags & NodeFlags.MultiLine) !== 0, | ||
| /*trailingComma*/ elements.hasTrailingComma); | ||
| write("]"); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| emitListWithSpread(elements, /*multiLine*/(node.flags & NodeFlags.MultiLine) !== 0, | ||
| /*trailingComma*/ elements.hasTrailingComma); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function emitObjectLiteral(node: ObjectLiteralExpression) { | ||
| write("{"); | ||
| var properties = node.properties; | ||
|
|
@@ -2492,7 +2496,75 @@ module ts { | |
| write("]"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function hasSpreadElement(elements: Expression[]) { | ||
| return forEach(elements, e => e.kind === SyntaxKind.SpreadElementExpression); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function skipParentheses(node: Expression): Expression { | ||
| while (node.kind === SyntaxKind.ParenthesizedExpression || node.kind === SyntaxKind.TypeAssertionExpression) { | ||
| node = (<ParenthesizedExpression>node).expression; | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This type assertion should be to
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Will do. |
||
| } | ||
| return node; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function emitTarget(node: Expression): Expression { | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe emitCallTarget? |
||
| if (node.kind === SyntaxKind.Identifier || node.kind === SyntaxKind.ThisKeyword || node.kind === SyntaxKind.SuperKeyword) { | ||
| emit(node); | ||
| return node; | ||
| } | ||
| var temp = createTempVariable(node); | ||
| recordTempDeclaration(temp); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can recordTempDeclaration be folded into createTempVariable?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It probably could, but I prefer keeping them separate instead of adding another boolean argument.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. My concern is that you could do one without the other and forget. In general I don't really like void functions that are just called imperatively like this, because somebody will forget. |
||
| write("("); | ||
| emit(temp); | ||
| write(" = "); | ||
| emit(node); | ||
| write(")"); | ||
| return temp; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function emitCallWithSpread(node: CallExpression) { | ||
| var target: Expression; | ||
| var expr = skipParentheses(node.expression); | ||
| if (expr.kind === SyntaxKind.PropertyAccessExpression) { | ||
| target = emitTarget((<PropertyAccessExpression>expr).expression); | ||
| write("."); | ||
| emit((<PropertyAccessExpression>expr).name); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Please comment to explain why it is like this, and not simply |
||
| } | ||
| else if (expr.kind === SyntaxKind.ElementAccessExpression) { | ||
| target = emitTarget((<PropertyAccessExpression>expr).expression); | ||
| write("["); | ||
| emit((<ElementAccessExpression>expr).argumentExpression); | ||
| write("]"); | ||
| } | ||
| else if (expr.kind === SyntaxKind.SuperKeyword) { | ||
| target = expr; | ||
| write("_super"); | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| emit(node.expression); | ||
| } | ||
| write(".apply("); | ||
| if (target) { | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you add a sample call for each case to see what it corresponds to? |
||
| if (target.kind === SyntaxKind.SuperKeyword) { | ||
| emitThis(target); | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| emit(target); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| write("void 0"); | ||
| } | ||
| write(", "); | ||
| emitListWithSpread(node.arguments, /*multiLine*/ false, /*trailingComma*/ false); | ||
| write(")"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function emitCallExpression(node: CallExpression) { | ||
| if (languageVersion < ScriptTarget.ES6 && hasSpreadElement(node.arguments)) { | ||
| emitCallWithSpread(node); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| var superCall = false; | ||
| if (node.expression.kind === SyntaxKind.SuperKeyword) { | ||
| write("_super"); | ||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1440,7 +1440,6 @@ module ts { | |
| case ParsingContext.TypeParameters: | ||
| return isIdentifier(); | ||
| case ParsingContext.ArgumentExpressions: | ||
| return token === SyntaxKind.CommaToken || isStartOfExpression(); | ||
| case ParsingContext.ArrayLiteralMembers: | ||
| return token === SyntaxKind.CommaToken || token === SyntaxKind.DotDotDotToken || isStartOfExpression(); | ||
| case ParsingContext.Parameters: | ||
|
|
@@ -3544,19 +3543,19 @@ module ts { | |
| return finishNode(node); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function parseArrayLiteralElement(): Expression { | ||
| function parseArgumentOrArrayLiteralElement(): Expression { | ||
| return token === SyntaxKind.DotDotDotToken ? parseSpreadElement() : parseAssignmentExpressionOrOmittedExpression(); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is parseAssignmentExpressionOrOmittedExpression called from anywhere else? If not, it might make sense to just fold it into here.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Isn't used anywhere else, I'll fold it in. |
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function parseArgumentExpression(): Expression { | ||
| return allowInAnd(parseAssignmentExpressionOrOmittedExpression); | ||
| return allowInAnd(parseArgumentOrArrayLiteralElement); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function parseArrayLiteralExpression(): ArrayLiteralExpression { | ||
| var node = <ArrayLiteralExpression>createNode(SyntaxKind.ArrayLiteralExpression); | ||
| parseExpected(SyntaxKind.OpenBracketToken); | ||
| if (scanner.hasPrecedingLineBreak()) node.flags |= NodeFlags.MultiLine; | ||
| node.elements = parseDelimitedList(ParsingContext.ArrayLiteralMembers, parseArrayLiteralElement); | ||
| node.elements = parseDelimitedList(ParsingContext.ArrayLiteralMembers, parseArgumentOrArrayLiteralElement); | ||
| parseExpected(SyntaxKind.CloseBracketToken); | ||
| return finishNode(node); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ | ||
| tests/cases/conformance/expressions/functionCalls/callWithSpread.ts(52,21): error TS2468: Spread operator in 'new' expressions is only available when targeting ECMAScript 6 and higher. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ==== tests/cases/conformance/expressions/functionCalls/callWithSpread.ts (1 errors) ==== | ||
| interface X { | ||
| foo(x: number, y: number, ...z: string[]); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function foo(x: number, y: number, ...z: string[]) { | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var a: string[]; | ||
| var z: number[]; | ||
| var obj: X; | ||
| var xa: X[]; | ||
|
|
||
| foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| foo(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| foo(1, 2, ...a, "abc"); | ||
|
|
||
| obj.foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| obj.foo(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| obj.foo(1, 2, ...a, "abc"); | ||
|
|
||
| (obj.foo)(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| (obj.foo)(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| (obj.foo)(1, 2, ...a, "abc"); | ||
|
|
||
| xa[1].foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| xa[1].foo(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| xa[1].foo(1, 2, ...a, "abc"); | ||
|
|
||
| (<Function>xa[1].foo)(...[1, 2, "abc"]); | ||
|
|
||
| class C { | ||
| constructor(x: number, y: number, ...z: string[]) { | ||
| this.foo(x, y); | ||
| this.foo(x, y, ...z); | ||
| } | ||
| foo(x: number, y: number, ...z: string[]) { | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| class D extends C { | ||
| constructor() { | ||
| super(1, 2); | ||
| super(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| } | ||
| foo() { | ||
| super.foo(1, 2); | ||
| super.foo(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Only supported in when target is ES6 | ||
| var c = new C(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| ~~~~ | ||
| !!! error TS2468: Spread operator in 'new' expressions is only available when targeting ECMAScript 6 and higher. | ||
|
|
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ | ||
| //// [callWithSpread.ts] | ||
| interface X { | ||
| foo(x: number, y: number, ...z: string[]); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function foo(x: number, y: number, ...z: string[]) { | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var a: string[]; | ||
| var z: number[]; | ||
| var obj: X; | ||
| var xa: X[]; | ||
|
|
||
| foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| foo(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| foo(1, 2, ...a, "abc"); | ||
|
|
||
| obj.foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| obj.foo(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| obj.foo(1, 2, ...a, "abc"); | ||
|
|
||
| (obj.foo)(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| (obj.foo)(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| (obj.foo)(1, 2, ...a, "abc"); | ||
|
|
||
| xa[1].foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| xa[1].foo(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| xa[1].foo(1, 2, ...a, "abc"); | ||
|
|
||
| (<Function>xa[1].foo)(...[1, 2, "abc"]); | ||
|
|
||
| class C { | ||
| constructor(x: number, y: number, ...z: string[]) { | ||
| this.foo(x, y); | ||
| this.foo(x, y, ...z); | ||
| } | ||
| foo(x: number, y: number, ...z: string[]) { | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| class D extends C { | ||
| constructor() { | ||
| super(1, 2); | ||
| super(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| } | ||
| foo() { | ||
| super.foo(1, 2); | ||
| super.foo(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Only supported in when target is ES6 | ||
| var c = new C(1, 2, ...a); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| //// [callWithSpread.js] | ||
| var __extends = this.__extends || function (d, b) { | ||
| for (var p in b) if (b.hasOwnProperty(p)) d[p] = b[p]; | ||
| function __() { this.constructor = d; } | ||
| __.prototype = b.prototype; | ||
| d.prototype = new __(); | ||
| }; | ||
| function foo(x, y) { | ||
| var z = []; | ||
| for (var _i = 2; _i < arguments.length; _i++) { | ||
| z[_i - 2] = arguments[_i]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| var a; | ||
| var z; | ||
| var obj; | ||
| var xa; | ||
| foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| foo.apply(void 0, [1, 2].concat(a)); | ||
| foo.apply(void 0, [1, 2].concat(a, ["abc"])); | ||
| obj.foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| obj.foo.apply(obj, [1, 2].concat(a)); | ||
| obj.foo.apply(obj, [1, 2].concat(a, ["abc"])); | ||
| (obj.foo)(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| obj.foo.apply(obj, [1, 2].concat(a)); | ||
| obj.foo.apply(obj, [1, 2].concat(a, ["abc"])); | ||
| xa[1].foo(1, 2, "abc"); | ||
| (_a = xa[1]).foo.apply(_a, [1, 2].concat(a)); | ||
| (_b = xa[1]).foo.apply(_b, [1, 2].concat(a, ["abc"])); | ||
| (_c = xa[1]).foo.apply(_c, [1, 2, "abc"]); | ||
| var C = (function () { | ||
| function C(x, y) { | ||
| var z = []; | ||
| for (var _i = 2; _i < arguments.length; _i++) { | ||
| z[_i - 2] = arguments[_i]; | ||
| } | ||
| this.foo(x, y); | ||
| this.foo.apply(this, [x, y].concat(z)); | ||
| } | ||
| C.prototype.foo = function (x, y) { | ||
| var z = []; | ||
| for (var _i = 2; _i < arguments.length; _i++) { | ||
| z[_i - 2] = arguments[_i]; | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| return C; | ||
| })(); | ||
| var D = (function (_super) { | ||
| __extends(D, _super); | ||
| function D() { | ||
| _super.call(this, 1, 2); | ||
| _super.apply(this, [1, 2].concat(a)); | ||
| } | ||
| D.prototype.foo = function () { | ||
| _super.prototype.foo.call(this, 1, 2); | ||
| _super.prototype.foo.apply(this, [1, 2].concat(a)); | ||
| }; | ||
| return D; | ||
| })(C); | ||
| // Only supported in when target is ES6 | ||
| var c = new C(1, 2, ...a); | ||
| var _a, _b, _c; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is pretty confusing. Can you put a comment explaining what this is doing? Also, I think it makes sense to replace the numbers with named constants. This can be addressed separately from this change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrelated to this checkin, all that changed was formatting (guess VS must have formatted the file).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, just pointing out that it would be good to clarify it, but in a separate change.