-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2321R2: views::adjacent_transform
, views::pairwise_transform
#3546
Merged
StephanTLavavej
merged 14 commits into
microsoft:main
from
JMazurkiewicz:adjacent_transform
Mar 17, 2023
Merged
P2321R2: views::adjacent_transform
, views::pairwise_transform
#3546
StephanTLavavej
merged 14 commits into
microsoft:main
from
JMazurkiewicz:adjacent_transform
Mar 17, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JMazurkiewicz
changed the title
Adjacent transform
P2321R2: Mar 7, 2023
views::adjacent_transform
, views::pairwise_transform
JMazurkiewicz
force-pushed
the
adjacent_transform
branch
from
March 7, 2023 15:29
e0f86cc
to
111a866
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
34 tasks
StephanTLavavej
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2023
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
StephanTLavavej
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2023
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
strega-nil-ms
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one minor request; will push changes.
never mind.
I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed. |
Thanks to you, @cpplearner, and @tylerbrawl, the 😻 🤐 🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #2252. Implemented features:
__cpp_lib_ranges_zip 202110L
,TODOReduce and report Clang bug marked in the code with
There is no need to report this bug, it's been fixed in Clang 16: https://godbolt.org/z/815f371Wc.LLVM-?
. Current repro:_Invoke_result_with_repeated_type_impl
had to be implemented as a recursive template (using index sequence caused ICE). See DevCom-10302378,