Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Check exp_id in experiment list #6305

Conversation

GOTYGuyOfTheYear
Copy link

Instead of checking with just the length of the experiment list.
Check that the exp_id is in the experiment list.
Useful when working with an offset or missing entries in the database.

Instead of checking with just the length of the experiment list.
Check that the exp_id is in the experiment list.
Useful when working with an offset or missing entries in the database.
@GOTYGuyOfTheYear GOTYGuyOfTheYear requested a review from a team as a code owner August 2, 2024 09:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.19%. Comparing base (8b37ef4) to head (071736e).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6305      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.19%   67.19%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         352      352              
  Lines       32152    32155       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        21606    21608       +2     
- Misses      10546    10547       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jenshnielsen
Copy link
Collaborator

@GOTYGuyOfTheYear Thanks

@jenshnielsen jenshnielsen enabled auto-merge August 2, 2024 13:31
@jenshnielsen jenshnielsen added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit 68589ff Aug 2, 2024
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants