Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Default to no multiprocessing. #319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2016
Merged

Conversation

giulioungaretti
Copy link
Contributor

@giulioungaretti giulioungaretti commented Aug 29, 2016

Fixes #314.

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • defaults to no multiprocessing
  • raises warnings if multiprocessing is used
  • fixes some test

This is a boring PR, but f.ex before merge one needs #315 .

@qcodes-bot
Copy link

Current coverage is 82.78% (diff: 100%)

Merging #319 into master will decrease coverage by 0.03%

@@             master       #319   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            34         34          
  Lines          3615       3637    +22   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
+ Hits           2994       3011    +17   
- Misses          621        626     +5   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update da80aa0...011ae1d

@giulioungaretti
Copy link
Contributor Author

And merging soon, unless @alexcjohnson disagrees.

import logging
import time
import warnings
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unused addition?

@giulioungaretti
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexcjohnson maybe I missed some other things, but I'd say this is done.

- python qcodes/test.py --skip-coverage
- python qcodes/test.py --mp-spawn
- python qcodes/test.py --skip-coverage -f
- python qcodes/test.py --mp-spawn -f
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we really want to fail fast on travis? I'd think a full failure report is more useful.

Also, if we're not supporting multiprocessing for now anyway, is it really worthwhile running the tests in both modes?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, because there are still people that just use multiprocessing, and knowing when we break things is useful.
The -f was just so that people read the output, it seems like it's always ignored, so maybe if it's shorted it's easier ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh right, I thought I was going to see that this PR disabled the multiprocessing tests but it didn't :) Good, so we leave both modes in.

If tests pass (which should be a requirement from now on, yes?), this doesn't shorten it at all. All it really does is shorten a horrendous multi-test failure into a single failure - which is enough to disqualify the commit, and it's nice that you get the feedback sooner, but I would still think the debugging cycle would be quicker if you could see all the failures at once. Of course it would be silly to debug only this way - after you see the error(s) on Travis then you test locally while fixing... dunno, if you prefer this way then leave it, in fact you could even go farther and chain the two commands so if the first fails, the spawn version doesn't even run.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alexcjohnson it shortens the output of the failure, in general people should test locally but I bet most don't .
We could remove the multiprocessing tests all together :D But that's for another PR.

@giulioungaretti
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexcjohnson on a second though I think I abused the warnings a bit :D I think I will just keep it in the qcodes process !

@alexcjohnson alexcjohnson mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2016
@giulioungaretti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh wow, merging this is going to be a bit tricky.

@giulioungaretti giulioungaretti force-pushed the feature/remove_mp branch 2 times, most recently from b23aca5 to 1af588c Compare October 1, 2016 20:41
@giulioungaretti
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alexcjohnson I think this is ready to merge.

data_manager (Optional[bool]): use a manager for the
``DataServer`` that offloads storage and syncing of this Defaults
to ``False`` i.e. this ``DataSet`` will store itself without extra
processes. ``DataSet``. Set to ``True`` to use the default from
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the word DataSet doing in this line?

data_manager (Optional[bool]): use a manager for the
``DataServer`` that offloads storage and syncing of this Defaults
to ``False`` i.e. this ``DataSet`` will store itself without extra
processes. ``DataSet``. Set to ``True`` to use the default from
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also here

cls.gates = MockGates(model=cls.model)
cls.source = MockSource(model=cls.model)
cls.meter = MockMeter(model=cls.model, keep_history=False)
import pdb
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

debugging leftover?


def setUp(self):
import pdb
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and here

Copy link
Contributor

@alexcjohnson alexcjohnson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple of little cleanup comments, but after those I am happy with it.

Because multiprocessing is not open for public use, unless one really
wants to use it.  The test are incredibly coupled, so they needed some
massaging too.

Closes #314.
@qcodes-bot
Copy link

Codacy Here is an overview of what got changed by this pull request:

Clones added
============
- qcodes/tests/test_loop.py  6

See the complete overview on Codacy

@giulioungaretti giulioungaretti merged commit 2068558 into master Oct 2, 2016
@giulioungaretti giulioungaretti deleted the feature/remove_mp branch October 2, 2016 20:27
giulioungaretti pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2016
Merge: a476f61 3ef83bc
Author: Giulio Ungaretti <[email protected]>

    Merge pull request #319 from qdev-dk/feature/remove_mp
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
vals=Numbers(-10, 10), step=0.2,
delay=0.01,
max_delay='forever')
self.crahs()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@giulioungaretti I missed this earlier - what's it about? We shouldn't ever get here, as add_parameter should error first...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah it's some leftovers, this pr took too long :D

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
4696: Update pytest-mock requirement from ~=3.9.0 to ~=3.10.0 r=jenshnielsen a=dependabot[bot]

Updates the requirements on [pytest-mock](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock) to permit the latest version.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/releases">pytest-mock's releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v3.10.0</h2>
<ul>
<li>Added new <code>mocker.stop(m)</code> method to stop specific <code>mocker.patch</code> or <code>mocker.spy</code> calls (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/319">#319</a>).</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst">pytest-mock's changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>3.10.0 (2022-10-05)</h2>
<ul>
<li>Added new <code>mocker.stop(m)</code> method to stop specific <code>mocker.patch</code> or <code>mocker.spy</code> calls (<code>[#319](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/319)</code>_).</li>
</ul>
<p>.. _<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/319">#319</a>: <a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/319">pytest-dev/pytest-mock#319</a></p>
<h2>3.9.0 (2022-09-28)</h2>
<ul>
<li>Expose <code>NonCallableMagicMock</code> via the <code>mocker</code> fixture (<code>[#318](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/318)</code>_).</li>
</ul>
<p>.. _<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/318">#318</a>: <a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/318">pytest-dev/pytest-mock#318</a></p>
<h2>3.8.2 (2022-07-05)</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fixed <code>AsyncMock</code> support for Python 3.7+ in <code>mocker.async_stub</code> (<code>[#302](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/302)</code>_).</li>
</ul>
<p>.. _<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/302">#302</a>: <a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/302">pytest-dev/pytest-mock#302</a></p>
<h2>3.8.1 (2022-06-24)</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fixed regression caused by an explicit <code>mock</code> dependency in the code (<code>[#298](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/298)</code>_).</li>
</ul>
<p>.. _<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/298">#298</a>: <a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/298">pytest-dev/pytest-mock#298</a></p>
<h2>3.8.0 (2022-06-24)</h2>
<ul>
<li>Add <code>MockerFixture.async_mock</code> method. Thanks <code>`@PerchunPak</code>_` for the PR (<code>[#296](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/296)</code>_).</li>
</ul>
<p>.. _<a href="https://github.com/PerchunPak"><code>`@​PerchunPak</code></a>:` <a href="https://github.com/PerchunPak">https://github.com/PerchunPak</a>
.. _<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/296">#296</a>: <a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/pull/296">pytest-dev/pytest-mock#296</a></p>
<h2>3.7.0 (2022-01-28)</h2>
<ul>
<li>Python 3.10 now officially supported.</li>
<li>Dropped support for Python 3.6.</li>
</ul>
<h2>3.6.1 (2021-05-06)</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fix <code>mocker.resetall()</code> when using <code>mocker.spy()</code> (<code>[#237](https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/237)</code><em>). Thanks <code>`@blaxter</code></em>` for the report and <code>`@shadycuz</code>_` for the PR.</li>
</ul>
<p>.. _<a href="https://github.com/blaxter"><code>`@​blaxter</code></a>:` <a href="https://github.com/blaxter">https://github.com/blaxter</a>
.. _<a href="https://github.com/shadycuz"><code>`@​shadycuz</code></a>:` <a href="https://github.com/shadycuz">https://github.com/shadycuz</a>
.. _<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/237">#237</a>: <a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/237">pytest-dev/pytest-mock#237</a></p>
<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/commit/6c03dfd4240de4a178bab67c0a32fba28d8bcf91"><code>6c03dfd</code></a> Release 3.10.0</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/commit/fbb5039d7269c34705a7dab39f2a2cea92111859"><code>fbb5039</code></a> Implement selective un-spying and un-patching (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/319">#319</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/commit/a1c7421daad8d6bc433db28a5df1b01bd0a93222"><code>a1c7421</code></a> [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/321">#321</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/commit/4f2703c94ce4838befc1ffef1c3bdca4ac1eccf2"><code>4f2703c</code></a> Add Python 3.11 support (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/320">#320</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/commit/1e2001fb78aeb42ae068cc0c17075016d47fa1a7"><code>1e2001f</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/318">#318</a> from willfrey/patch-2</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/commit/798f07e99773b05d284be6f4cb32e79d532965b5"><code>798f07e</code></a> [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (<a href="https://github-redirect.dependabot.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/issues/317">#317</a>)</li>
<li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/compare/v3.9.0...v3.10.0">compare view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />


You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting ``@dependabot` rebase`.

[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)

---

<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- ``@dependabot` rebase` will rebase this PR
- ``@dependabot` recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
- ``@dependabot` merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- ``@dependabot` squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- ``@dependabot` cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
- ``@dependabot` reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- ``@dependabot` close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- ``@dependabot` ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- ``@dependabot` ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- ``@dependabot` ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)


</details>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Default to no multiprocessing.
3 participants