-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[python-package] support sub-classing scikit-learn estimators #6783
Open
jameslamb
wants to merge
16
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
python/sklearn-subclassing
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+285
−132
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3b5f648
[python-package] make sub-classing scikit-learn estimators easier
jameslamb 02c48c3
tests passing
jameslamb 7b720cb
add docs
jameslamb 51b5e64
Update tests/python_package_test/test_sklearn.py
jameslamb 81178fd
remove docs links
jameslamb 110b0e1
Merge branch 'python/sklearn-subclassing' of github.com:microsoft/Lig…
jameslamb 104471a
Merge branch 'master' into python/sklearn-subclassing
jameslamb d80b0df
fix Dask tests
jameslamb b7e041a
Merge branch 'python/sklearn-subclassing' of github.com:microsoft/Lig…
jameslamb 68177a7
Merge branch 'master' into python/sklearn-subclassing
StrikerRUS 70f29a7
Merge branch 'master' into python/sklearn-subclassing
jameslamb 6796ba9
Merge branch 'master' into python/sklearn-subclassing
jameslamb 409733a
Update tests/python_package_test/test_dask.py
jameslamb 0a40e9b
Update python-package/lightgbm/sklearn.py
jameslamb cd54639
Update docs/FAQ.rst
jameslamb e39d19f
Merge branch 'master' into python/sklearn-subclassing
jameslamb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think it's OK to have just one
client
argument in the signature, but describe all parent args in the docstring?..There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's a little better for users to see all the parameters right here, instead of having to click over to another page.
This is what XGBoost is doing too: https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/stable/python/python_api.html#xgboost.XGBRFRegressor
But I do also appreciate that it could look confusing.
If we don't do it this way, then I'd recommend we add a link in the docs for `**kwargs`` in these estimators, like this:
I have a weak preference for keeping it as-is (the signature in docs not having all parameters, but docstring having all parameters), but happy to change it if you think that's confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for clarifying your opinion!
I love your suggestion for
**kwargs
description. But my preference is also weak 🙂I think we need a third judge opinion for this question.
Either way, I'm approving this PR!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jmoralez or @borchero could one of you comment on this thread and help us break the tie?
To make progress on the release, if we don't hear back in the next 2 days I'll merge this PR as-is and we can come back and change the docs later.