[WIP] Compare & contrast these two PR's and the way in which they implement the new MCP-UI library into the Codename Goose agent framework. Review the conversations and note key differences in the two different implementations. To what extent does 3432 addres... #1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Current Understanding
The Goose repository has a sophisticated MCP (Model Context Protocol) implementation with:
Backend (Rust):
mcp-core: Core MCP protocol implementationgoose-mcp: Goose-specific MCP server integrationmcp-clientandmcp-server: Client/server protocol handlingFrontend (TypeScript/Electron):
basic-mcp.ts)Documentation:
Since PRs block#2948 and block#3432 don't exist in this repository, I'll create a theoretical comparison analysis based on common MCP-UI integration patterns and architectural approaches.
💬 Share your feedback on Copilot coding agent for the chance to win a $200 gift card! Click here to start the survey.