-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modifying notes on checksum to reflect recent updates regarding empty checksumType field #497
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @fracappa. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a metal3-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
… checksumType field Signed-off-by: fracappa <[email protected]> changing line length
of the BareMetalHost API. | ||
Setting `checksumType` to `auto` or leaving it empty prompts Ironic to | ||
automatically detect the checksum type based on its length and will become | ||
the default in the next version of the BareMetalHost API. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The last part is no longer relevant: the default in the next version will be the same as the default you introduced.
Instead, it may be useful to mention the version of BMO where the empty string works the same as auto.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we know if it will be BMO v 0.10.0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Next version of BMO per milestones is v0.10.0. I don't think we're doing anything this release cycle to warrant major bump
Hi everyone.
As suggested by community members, I would like to propose those changes regarding checksumType notes to reflect modifications introduced in this PR.
The idea, is allowing the empty
checksumType
to behave the same way as theauto
case.This could be taken as a proposal for a new version of BMO (it could be 0.10.0).
Glad to receive any possible feedback.
Thanks.