#769 issue updated and comment is errased

[ChrissHenilston777]

This PR fixes #769.

This change replaces hardcoded integer values for log levels in the broker/nats and broker/channel packages with the appropriate logrus.InfoLevel constant. This improves code readability and maintainability.

Notes for Reviewers:

This is a straightforward refactoring to remove magic numbers and align with the logger's intended usage. No functional changes are introduced.

Signed commits

• Yes, I signed my commits.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ChrissHenilston777, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a targeted refactoring effort to enhance the clarity and robustness of the logging configuration within the broker components. By replacing arbitrary integer values with a well-defined constant for the 'Info' log level, the change ensures that the logging setup is more explicit and less prone to errors, ultimately improving the overall code quality without altering any functional behavior.

Highlights

• Refactoring Log Levels: Replaced hardcoded integer values for log levels with the logrus.InfoLevel constant in the broker/nats and broker/channel packages.
• Improved Readability and Maintainability: This change eliminates 'magic numbers', making the code easier to understand and maintain by explicitly using named constants for log levels.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly replaces hardcoded integer values for log levels with the logrus.InfoLevel constant, which is a good improvement for code readability and maintainability. The changes are straightforward and align with the goal of removing magic numbers. I have one minor suggestion to further improve code clarity and consistency.

[gemini-code-assist]

The comment // Info level is now redundant because the constant logrus.InfoLevel is self-descriptive. For consistency with the changes in broker/nats/nats.go (where a similar comment was removed), it would be best to remove this comment to improve code clarity.

Suggested change

	LogLevel: int(logrus.InfoLevel), // Info level
	LogLevel: int(logrus.InfoLevel),

[Namanv0509]

@ChrissHenilston777 Thank You for your contribution!!
If this work is complete, this is a good item to add to the weekly Meshery Development meeting agenda. You can add this item in the doc, attend, and present it. Meeting details at https://meet.layer5.io/meshery.