Skip to content

Conversation

ChrissHenilston777
Copy link

@ChrissHenilston777 ChrissHenilston777 commented Sep 11, 2025

Description

This PR fixes #796

Notes for Reviewers
logrus.InfoLevel is the specific level of verbosity.where current loglevel hardcoded to 4 which is the constant of the logrus level.to make it readable for programmers and contributor ,i updated from the loglevel 4 to logrus.Infolevel.
folder nats.go line #101 updated and #796 issue is resolved

Signed commits

  • Yes, I signed my commits.
  • logrus-constant

Copy link

welcome bot commented Sep 11, 2025

Yay, your first pull request! 👍 A contributor will be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, you can find updates in the #github-notifications channel in the community Slack.
Be sure to double-check that you have signed your commits. Here are instructions for making signing an implicit activity while performing a commit.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @ChrissHenilston777, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to improve the clarity and maintainability of the logging configuration within the NATS broker implementation. By replacing a numeric constant with a named constant from the logrus library, the code becomes more self-documenting and easier for developers to understand the intended log verbosity.

Highlights

  • Log Level Readability: Replaced the hardcoded integer 4 with int(logrus.InfoLevel) for setting the log level in nats.go, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
  • Dependency Update: Added the github.com/sirupsen/logrus import to support the use of logrus.InfoLevel.
  • Issue Resolution: This change directly addresses and resolves issue #796.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request improves code readability by replacing a hardcoded magic number for the log level with the logrus.InfoLevel constant. This is a good change that makes the code easier to understand. I have one suggestion to further improve code clarity by removing a redundant comment. The addition of a newline at the end of the file is also a good fix.

Copy link

🚨 Alert! Git Police! We couldn’t help but notice that one or more of your commits is missing a sign-off. A what? A commit sign-off (your email address).

To amend the commits in this PR with your signoff using the instructions provided in the DCO check.

To configure your dev environment to automatically signoff on your commits in the future, see these instructions.


        Be sure to join the community, if you haven't yet and please leave a ⭐ star on the project 😄

@lekaf974
Copy link
Contributor

lekaf974 commented Sep 11, 2025

you did not sign off your commit uncheck in the the description

@ChrissHenilston777
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the feedback! My goal with this PR was to address issue #796 by removing the magic number. Making the log level configurable is a great idea for a future enhancement. If that's the desired direction, I'd be happy to open a new issue for it

log, err = logger.New("channel-broker", logger.Options{
Format: logger.TerminalLogFormat,
LogLevel: 4, // Info level
LogLevel: int(logrus.InfoLevel), // Info level is updated
Copy link
Contributor

@n2h9 n2h9 Sep 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think comment is redundant here, could we please remove it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[refactoring] Replace LogLevel 4 to value from constant

3 participants