Skip to content

Conversation

@lwsinclair
Copy link

Hi there,

This pull request shares a security update on lokka.

We also have an entry for lokka in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.

We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of lokka.

You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/merill-lokka.

Yours Sincerely,

Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust


MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge

Here are our latest evaluation results of lokka

Security Scan Results

Security Score: 100/100

Risk Level: low

Scan Date: 2025-06-13

Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices

This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @lwsinclair, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new badge to the project's README.md file. The badge, provided by MseeP.ai, aims to inform users about the project's security assessment status, linking to a third-party validation service that provides ongoing security and trust updates.

Highlights

  • README Update: Added a MseeP.ai security assessment badge to the top of the README.md file. This badge links to the project's security assessment page on MseeP.ai, providing third-party validation of the project's security posture.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a security badge from MseeP.ai to the project's README file. My review focuses on the placement of this new badge. I've suggested a change to position the badge after the main project title, alongside other existing badges, to adhere to common documentation standards and improve readability.

Comment on lines +1 to 5
[![MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge](https://mseep.net/pr/merill-lokka-badge.png)](https://mseep.ai/app/merill-lokka)

# Lokka

[![npm version](https://badge.fury.io/js/@merill%2Flokka.svg)](https://badge.fury.io/js/@merill%2Flokka)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Thanks for adding the security badge. For consistency and to follow common README conventions, it's best to place badges directly after the main project title. This also helps in keeping all badges grouped together.

I'd suggest reordering the content to have the title first, followed by the badges.

Suggested change
[![MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge](https://mseep.net/pr/merill-lokka-badge.png)](https://mseep.ai/app/merill-lokka)
# Lokka
[![npm version](https://badge.fury.io/js/@merill%2Flokka.svg)](https://badge.fury.io/js/@merill%2Flokka)
# Lokka
[![MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge](https://mseep.net/pr/merill-lokka-badge.png)](https://mseep.ai/app/merill-lokka)
[![npm version](https://badge.fury.io/js/@merill%2Flokka.svg)](https://badge.fury.io/js/@merill%2Flokka)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant