Add MseeP.ai badge #15
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @lwsinclair, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request adds a "MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge" to the README.md file. The badge links to the MseeP.ai website, where users can view security and trust updates for the lokka application. The intention is to provide users with a third-party validation of lokka's security.
Highlights
- New Badge: A new badge from MseeP.ai has been added to the README to show the security assessment of the lokka application.
- Third-party Validation: The badge links to a third-party website that provides ongoing security and trust updates.
Changelog
- README.md
- Added MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge at the top of the README file, above the existing npm version badge.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A badge so bright,
A security score's delight,
Trust in the code's might.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a security assessment badge from MseeP.ai to the README.md. Displaying such a badge can be beneficial for communicating the project's security posture.
The Markdown syntax for adding the badge is correct and follows common conventions. However, a significant concern has been identified regarding the content of the badge itself: the "Scan Date" is set to "2025-05-08", which is in the future. This detail could mislead users and affect the credibility of the assessment. Please see the detailed comment on the README.md file.
Apart from this, the change is straightforward.
Summary of Findings
- Misleading Future Scan Date on Security Badge: The security badge image (and the PR description) displays a 'Scan Date' of '2025-05-08', which is in the future. This is misleading and undermines the badge's credibility. This should be clarified or corrected before merging.
Merge Readiness
Due to the potentially misleading future scan date on the security badge, I recommend that this change not be merged until this issue is addressed. An accurate and credible scan date is important for such a badge. I am unable to approve pull requests, but I advise resolving this concern before considering this PR for merging. Other reviewers should also assess this.
| @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ | |||
| [](https://mseep.ai/app/merill-lokka) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The security assessment badge image displays a "Scan Date" of "2025-05-08", which is in the future. This is also reflected in the PR description's security scan results.
A future scan date could be misleading to users and potentially undermine the credibility of the badge and the assessment itself.
Could you please clarify why the scan date is in the future? Is an updated badge with a current or past (actual) scan date available from MseeP.ai?
1 participant
Hi there,
This pull request shares a security update on lokka.
We also have an entry for lokka in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.
We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of lokka.
You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/merill-lokka.
Yours Sincerely,
Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust
Here are our latest evaluation results of lokka
Security Scan Results
Security Score: 100/100
Risk Level: low
Scan Date: 2025-05-08
Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices
This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.