enhancement: update layout hub when left panel collapse

[urmauur]

Describe Your Changes

This pull request refactors the Hub component in web-app/src/routes/hub.tsx to improve code reusability and maintainability by introducing the HeaderPage container. The changes primarily focus on restructuring the header section of the component.

Refactoring for code reusability:

• Added an import for the HeaderPage container in web-app/src/routes/hub.tsx to enable its usage in the Hub component.
• Replaced the existing header structure with the HeaderPage container, wrapping the header content inside it for better modularity and consistency. [1] [2]

Fixes Issues

• Closes #
• Closes #

Self Checklist

• Added relevant comments, esp in complex areas
• Updated docs (for bug fixes / features)
• Created issues for follow-up changes or refactoring needed

---

Important

Refactor Hub component in hub.tsx by introducing HeaderPage container for improved modularity and reusability.

• Refactoring:
  • Introduced HeaderPage container in hub.tsx for header section.
  • Replaced existing header structure with HeaderPage for modularity and consistency.

^{This description was created by for 661e907. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 661e907 in 1 minute and 35 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 96 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. web-app/src/routes/hub.tsx:164

• Draft comment:
  Potential layout issue: Previously the header used 'px-4' (padding on both sides), but now it's 'pr-4' (only right padding). Ensure that the omitted left padding is intentional or provided by HeaderPage.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% This is a UI/styling change. The author deliberately changed the padding and added HeaderPage. The rules explicitly state not to comment on UI/styling changes and to assume the author made these changes correctly. Even if there was an issue, it would be immediately visible in the UI and fixed if it looked wrong. Maybe this could cause a serious layout issue that breaks functionality rather than just aesthetics? Maybe HeaderPage doesn't provide the expected padding? No - this is purely about visual padding and styling. The rules are very clear that we should trust the author on UI changes. If the padding was wrong, it would be obvious in testing. Delete this comment as it violates the rule about not commenting on UI and styling changes.

2. web-app/src/routes/hub.tsx:164

• Draft comment:
  Refactor improvement: The header content is now wrapped in a HeaderPage container for modularity. Verify that HeaderPage’s default styles and behavior align with the intended layout.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_GgThrBMSA8pwHjuT

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[github-actions]

This is the build for this pull request. You can download it from the Artifacts section here: Build URL.

[louis-menlo]

Thanks!

[github-actions]

This is the build for this pull request. You can download it from the Artifacts section here: Build URL.