Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Web/API page types, part 4 #16705

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 27, 2022
Merged

Conversation

wbamberg
Copy link
Collaborator

See #16255. This is part 4 of a series of PRs to add page types to the Web/API documentation.

@wbamberg wbamberg requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2022 00:06
@wbamberg wbamberg requested review from jpmedley and removed request for a team May 27, 2022 00:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Content:WebAPI Web API docs label May 27, 2022
@github-actions

This comment was marked as resolved.

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
---
title: CSS numeric factory functions
slug: Web/API/CSS/factory_functions
page-type: web-api-static-method
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a comment: We have grouped here a big deal of static methods together. so, a bit pedantly, web-api-static-method is not 100% accurate, but I think we should go ahead with it.

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
---
title: CSS
slug: Web/API/CSS
page-type: web-api-interface
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Strictly speaking, this is also a special case: WebIDL defines it as a namespace, so I guess having it as an interface with static methods/properties is the right thing to do for now. In JS, we will have other similar cases (like Intl)

@teoli2003 teoli2003 merged commit 6c498a4 into mdn:main May 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Content:WebAPI Web API docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants