Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sbt-sonatype to 3.11.1 #82

Conversation

scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor

About this PR

πŸ“¦ Updates org.xerial.sbt:sbt-sonatype from 3.10.0 to 3.11.1

πŸ“œ GitHub Release Notes - Release Notes - Version Diff

Usage

βœ… Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

βš™ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.xerial.sbt", artifactId = "sbt-sonatype" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.xerial.sbt", artifactId = "sbt-sonatype" }
}]
labels: sbt-plugin-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, commit-count:1

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 29, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10150271482

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 93.939%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9148466249: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 93
Relevant Lines: 99

πŸ’› - Coveralls

@scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #85.

@scala-steward scala-steward deleted the update/sbt-sonatype-3.11.1 branch August 12, 2024 23:34
@scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #87.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants