Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Django 4.2 upgrade issues #939

Closed
3 of 31 tasks
stevenbal opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1024
Closed
3 of 31 tasks

Django 4.2 upgrade issues #939

stevenbal opened this issue Jan 8, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1024
Assignees
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Comments

@stevenbal
Copy link
Contributor

stevenbal commented Jan 8, 2024

There are incompatible versions in the resolved dependencies:

  • Django>=4.2<5.0 (from -r requirements/base.in (line 16))
  • django>=2.2 (from django-localflavor==3.1->-r requirements/base.in (line 28)) localflavor 4.0 should support django 4.2
  • django>=2.2 (from djangorestframework==3.12.4->-r requirements/base.in (line 68)) version 3.14.x supports 4.1, no 4.2 support yet
  • django>=3.2 (from django-log-outgoing-requests==0.5.2->-r requirements/base.in (line 52)) should be fine?
  • django>=3.2 (from django-open-forms-client==0.2.3->-r requirements/base.in (line 47))
  • django>=3.2 (from django-privates==1.5.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 29))
  • django>=2.2 (from django-axes==5.25.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 18))
  • Django<5.0,>=2.2 (from django-cms==3.11.1->-r requirements/base.in (line 56))
  • Django>=2.2 (from drf-spectacular==0.20.1->-r requirements/base.in (line 71))
  • Django>=1.8 (from mail-editor->-r requirements/base.in (line 41))
  • Django>=2.2 (from django-cors-headers==3.10.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 30))
  • django>=2.2 (from django-timeline-logger==2.0.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 43))
  • Django>=1.8 (from django-csp==3.7->-r requirements/base.in (line 44))
  • django<5.0,>=2.2 (from django-csp-reports==1.8.1->-r requirements/base.in (line 45))
  • django>=3.2.0 (from django-digid-eherkenning==0.9.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 82))
  • Django>=2.2 (from django-extra-fields==3.0.2->-r requirements/base.in (line 69))
  • Django!=3.0.*,>=2.2 (from django-registration==3.2->-r requirements/base.in (line 36))
  • django>=3.2.0 (from zgw-consumers==0.25.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 88))
  • django<5.1,>=3.2 (from django-filer==3.1.1->-r requirements/base.in (line 19))
  • Django<4.0.0,>=2.2.0 (from maykin-django-two-factor-auth==2.0.4->-r requirements/base.in (line 26))
  • Django>=2.0 (from django-rosetta==0.9.7->-r requirements/base.in (line 23))
  • Django>=2.2 (from django-filter==21.1->-r requirements/base.in (line 70))
  • Django>=2.2 (from django-redis==5.0.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 22))
  • django>=2.2 (from django-hijack==3.0.4->-r requirements/base.in (line 20))
  • Django (from django-view-breadcrumbs==2.2.4->-r requirements/base.in (line 37))
  • Django>=3.2 (from django-htmx==1.13.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 48))
  • django>=3.1.0 (from mozilla-django-oidc-db==0.12.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 46))
  • Django>=2.2 (from django-sniplates==0.7.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 24))
  • django>=3.2.0 (from notifications-api-common==0.2.0->-r requirements/base.in (line 89))
  • Django>=2.2 (from django-import-export==2.6.1->-r requirements/base.in (line 33))
  • Django>=2.2 (from django-treebeard==4.4->-r requirements/base.in (line 25))

Issues:

  • maykin-django-two-factor-auth
@stevenbal stevenbal added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jan 8, 2024
@stevenbal stevenbal self-assigned this Jan 8, 2024
stevenbal added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2024
stevenbal added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2024
to be compatible with Django 4.x
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
    * refactor logging, move logic from DocumentDeleteView.delete() to
      form_valid()
    * normalize data structure and correct type annotation in `InboxView`
      (confusion between queryset and list)
    * refactor logging in the context of DigiD user change/creation
      since db logging caused `ValueError: save() prohibited to prevent
      data loss due to unsaved related object 'content_object'`
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
pi-sigma added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
alextreme added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant